Cited by 908Semiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesQuantum optics and atomic interactionsStrong Light-Matter Interactions

Single-photon sources

Open access
Lounis, Brahim, Orrit, Michel·2005·Reports on Progress in Physics

Abstract

The concept of the photon , central to Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect, is exactly 100 years old. Yet, while photons have been detected individually for more than 50 years, devices producing individual photons on demand have only appeared in the last few years. New concepts for single-photon sources, or 'photon guns', have originated from recent progress in the optical detection, characterization and manipulation of single quantum objects. Single emitters usually deliver photons one at a time. This so-called antibunching of emitted photons can arise from various mechanisms, but ensures that the probability of obtaining two or more photons at the same time remains negligible. We briefly recall basic concepts in quantum optics and discuss potential applications of single-photon states to optical processing of quantum information: cryptography, computing and communication. A photon gun's properties are significantly improved by coupling it to a resonant cavity mode, either in the Purcell or strong-coupling regimes. We briefly recall early production of single photons with atomic beams, and the operation principles of macroscopic parametric sources, which are used in an overwhelming majority of quantum-optical experiments. We then review the photophysical and spectroscopic properties and compare the advantages and weaknesses of various single nanometre-scale objects used as single-photon sources: atoms or ions in the gas phase and, in condensed matter, organic molecules, defect centres, semiconductor nanocrystals and heterostructures. As new generations of sources are developed, coupling to cavities and nano-fabrication techniques lead to improved characteristics, delivery rates and spectral ranges. Judging from the brisk pace of recent progress, we expect single photons to soon proceed from demonstrations to applications and to bring with them the first practical uses of quantum information.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review surveys the physics, applications, and material platforms for on-demand single-photon sources, emphasizing antibunching from single quantum emitters and cavity coupling. It concludes that source choice depends on the application: room-temperature emitters suffice for number-state uses, while indistinguishable photons for quantum computation require atoms/ions or cryogenic solid-state emitters.

Key findings

  • An ideal single-photon source requires both perfect antibunching and deterministic preparation of the excited state; the emission quantum yield must be unity or close to it. Cavity coupling can enhance emission rates, collection, and spectral properties via Purcell or strong-coupling regimes.
  • For quantum key distribution, a single-photon source tolerates more channel loss than faint laser pulses: the security condition is \(T_{AB} > p_{\rm dark}/\eta_{\rm det}\) for a single-photon source versus \(T_{AB} > \sqrt{2p_{\rm dark}}/\eta_{\rm det}\) for attenuated laser pulses.
  • Parametric down-conversion remains the workhorse for quantum optics but gives Poissonian photon pairs; a typical rate is \(10^7\) pairs/s at 10 mW cw pump, with about 1% probability of two pairs in a 1 ns slot, yielding \(10^6\) single photons/s with 10% detection on one fiber.
  • Emitter comparison: atoms/ions give pure, indistinguishable photons but require complex UHV/trapping setups; molecules, colour centres, and nanocrystals can operate at room temperature but often have broad lines, dark states, or blinking; self-assembled quantum dots are bright and stable at low temperature, with one dot showing >80% photon indistinguishability in a Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment. Cavity examples include Purcell factor \(F_P \approx 5.8\), \(Q \sim 1000\), and \(\beta \approx 80\%\) in a micropost, and \(F_P \approx 6\), \(Q \sim 10^4\) in microdisc cavities.

Methods

  • Review article synthesizing quantum optics, cavity QED, and single-emitter photophysics; no new primary experiments are reported.
  • Compares source classes—atoms/ions, organic molecules, colour centres, semiconductor nanocrystals, self-assembled quantum dots, and heterostructures—using reported spectroscopic and photophysical properties.
  • Summarizes characteristic features in Table 2, described by the authors as estimates for rough comparison.

Limitations

  • Stated: many technical problems remain before single-photon sources become as standard and user-friendly as lasers; current setups must be downsized and simplified for routine use.
  • Stated: progress on sources cannot be separated from detector progress; higher collection/transmission efficiencies and higher detection yields are needed, especially for near-infrared communication wavelengths.
  • Evident from text: this is a review, not a primary study; Table 2 numbers are explicitly estimates, and several source limitations are platform-specific—atoms/ions require complex apparatus, molecules can photobleach or enter dark states, nanocrystals blink, and quantum dots typically require cryogenic temperatures and spectral filtering.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0034-4885/68/5/r04

Cites

213 of 213 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 155 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning

    For an ideal single-photon source, the probability of observing n counts for M emitted photons is p_x(n) = binomial(M, n) (xT)^n (1-xT)^(M-n).

    “The probability of observing n counts for M emitted photons is therefore p x (n) = n M (xT ) n (1 -xT ) M-n . (17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    For the coherent source, adding the variances of the signal and reference measurements gives the variance for the transmission coefficient T^2_C = (1/(xM T))(T+1).

    “Adding the variances (or squared standard deviations) of the two signals, we obtain the following variance for the transmission coefficient measured with the coherent source: T 2 C = 1 xM T (T + 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    For the transmission measurement with an ideal single-photon source, the variance is T^2_SP = (1/(xM T))(T+1-2xT).

    “For the transmission measurement, the variance becomes T 2 SP = 1 xM T (T + 1 -2xT ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The ratio of the variances for the single-photon source to the coherent source is T^2_SP/T^2_C = (1-2xT)/(1+T).

    “With a similar result for the reference measurement, the ratio of the variances for the squeezed to coherent cases is T 2 SP T 2 C = 1 -2x T 1 + T , (18”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    For a coherent source with large average number M of photons transmitted by an absorbing medium with intensity transmission T and measured by a photon-counting detector with quantum yield x, the distribution of detected counts is Poissonian with average S_C = xMT and shot noise N_C = √(xMT).

    “The distribution of the detected counts is also Poissonian, with the average number of detected counts (supposed to be large) S C = xMT and with the shot noise (standard deviation) N C = √ xMT .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 86
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 73
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    With an ideal single-photon source, the average number of detected counts is the same as for the coherent source, but the distribution of photon counts is binomial.

    “If we now repeat this experiment with an ideal single-photon source, the average number of detected counts is the same, but the distribution of photon counts is now binomial.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The standard deviation of the single-photon source count distribution is less than that of a Poisson distribution and leads to noise N_SP = √(xMT(1-xT)).

    “The standard deviation of the distribution (17) is less than that of a Poisson distribution and leads to the following noise: N SP = xMT (1 -xT ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    For a source to emit one photon with certainty, the excited state of the emitter must be prepared with certainty.

    “(ii) The excited state of the emitter must be prepared with certainty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    A cavity can channel emitted photons into a well-defined spatial mode to improve collection efficiency and to match further utilization.

    “it can channel the emitted photons into a well-defined spatial mode to improve collection efficiency and to match further utilization”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A photon gun's properties are significantly improved by coupling it to a resonant cavity mode, either in the Purcell or strong-coupling regimes.

    “A photon gun's properties are significantly improved by coupling it to a resonant cavity mode, either in the Purcell or strong-coupling regimes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A single emitter acts as a nonlinear filter, eliminating the shot noise of the laser for short time intervals and only for photons redirected into the detection mode.

    “In other words, it acts as a nonlinear filter, eliminating the shot noise of the laser, albeit for short time intervals, and only for those photons redirected into the detection mode.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The low noise level of a single-photon source would be very valuable for measurements of weak absorption signals.

    “The low noise level of a single-photon source would be very valuable for such measurements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The detection of weak absorption signals is in general hampered by photon noise.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A microscopic emitter of light can only realize its full potential as a single-photon source if it is coupled to a resonant cavity.

    “A microscopic emitter of light, say an atom, can only realize its full potential as a single-photon source if it is coupled to a resonant cavity, which can fulfil several functions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Photon antibunching was detected in the fluorescence of single molecules and in the emission of other individual nano-objects in condensed matter.

    “For example, photon antibunching was detected in the fluorescence of single molecules (Basché et al 1992) and in the emission of other individual nano-objects in condensed matter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Basché et al 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Photon antibunching was first observed in the fluorescence from an attenuated sodium atomic beam, where at most one atom was present in the excitation focus at any time.

    “It was first observed in the fluorescence from an attenuated sodium atomic beam, where at most one atom was present in the excitation focus at any time (Kimble et al 1977, Walls 1979, Cresser et al 1982).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kimble et al 1977

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Walls 1979 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cresser et al 1982

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Recent progress in the fabrication, manipulation and characterization of individual nano-objects, molecules and nanocrystals has opened new routes for the production of number-states containing one single photon.

    “Recent progress in the fabrication, manipulation and characterization of individual nano-objects, molecules and nanocrystals has opened new routes for the production of number-states containing one single photon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    A cavity can restrict the spectral range of the emission.

    “or it can restrict the spectral range of the emission.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Antibunching of emitted photons ensures that the probability of obtaining two or more photons at the same time remains negligible.

    “This so-called antibunching of emitted photons can arise from various mechanisms, but ensures that the probability of obtaining two or more photons at the same time remains negligible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    For a source to emit one photon with certainty, the emission quantum yield must be unity, or as close to it as possible.

    “the emission quantum yield must be unity, or as close to it as possible”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    A cavity can enhance the spontaneous emission rate and thereby the rate of photon production.

    “A cavity can enhance the spontaneous emission rate and thereby the rate of photon production”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Pure spontaneous emission by an ideal two-level system leads to perfectly indistinguishable photons.

    “Pure spontaneous emission by an ideal two-level system leads to perfectly indistinguishable photons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Antibunching is an essential ingredient for the production of single photons, but the photophysical mechanisms by which it arises are different for different kinds of emitters.

    “Antibunching is an essential ingredient for the production of single photons, but as we discuss in section 6, the photophysical mechanisms by which it arises are different for the different kinds of emitters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The cascading calcium atoms and the faint sodium beam were the first sources of single photons, but their brightness was very low, and their operation was limited by the density and transit times of the atoms and could not be controlled.

    “Although the cascading calcium atoms and the faint sodium beam were the first sources of single photons, their brightness was very low, and a further drawback was that the operation of the source was limited by the density and transit times of the atoms and could not be controlled.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Most of the emitters discussed in the paper have emission quantum yield close to unity.

    “which is the case for most of the emitters we discuss here”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Mobile emitters such as atoms may deliver different spatial wavepackets at different times or may couple with variable efficiency to the fixed spatial mode of a cavity.

    “Mobile emitters such as atoms may deliver different spatial wavepackets at different times or may couple with variable efficiency to the fixed spatial mode of a cavity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A single-photon source delivers amplitude-squeezed light, which implies that its noise is reduced for intensity measurements.

    “A single-photon source delivers amplitude-squeezed light, which implies that its noise is reduced for intensity measurements (Xiao et al 1987, Polzik et al 1992).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Xiao et al 1987

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Polzik et al 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The lifetime can be considerably altered if the object is placed in a high-finesse cavity, which may amplify or reduce vacuum fluctuations at the emission frequency, thereby forcing or blocking spontaneous emission.

    “In addition to these short-range effects, the lifetime can be considerably altered if the object is placed in a high-finesse cavity, which may amplify or reduce vacuum fluctuations at the emission frequency, thereby 'forcing' or 'blocking' spontaneous emission (see section 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    To be used in interference, telecommunication or computation experiments, photons have to be collected and collimated into a given spatial mode.

    “To be used in interference, telecommunication or computation experiments, photons have to be collected and collimated into a given spatial mode.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Two emitted photons separated by a time interval longer than the spectral diffusion time will be distinguishable in principle, because their frequencies will differ and they will not interfere.

    “Two emitted photons separated by a time interval longer than the spectral diffusion time will be distinguishable in principle, because their frequencies will differ and they will not interfere (Santori et al 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Santori et al 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Indistinguishability requires lifetime-limited sources, i.e. emitters for which dephasing and spectral diffusion are negligible.

    “Indistinguishability requires lifetime-limited sources, i.e. emitters for which dephasing and spectral diffusion are negligible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: For most systems in condensed matter at room temperature, the dephasing time is by several orders of magnitude shorter than the excited state lifetime, so the linewidth is very far from being lifetime-limited.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The global quantum state of an entangled system remains non-separable even when the two particles are widely separated and unable to interact or communicate.

    “The global quantum state of an entangled system, say of two particles, remains non-separable, even when the two particles are widely separated from each other and unable to interact or communicate in any way.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    For efficient utilization, the spatial mode of the photon at the output of the source must be matched to those of all subsequent optical components, in particular that of the detector.

    “For an efficient utilization, the spatial mode of the photon at the output of the source must be matched to those of all subsequent optical components, in particular that of the detector.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The spontaneous emission lifetime limits the rate at which single photons can be emitted and is an important feature of the source.

    “Therefore, the spontaneous emission lifetime eventually limits the rate at which the single photons can be emitted and is an important feature of the source.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    At a higher level of approximation, the local-field correction depends both on the exact structure of the dielectric around the emitter and on the geometry.

    “At a higher level of approximation, the local-field correction depends both on the exact structure of the dielectric around the emitter and on the geometry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Unless the emitter undergoes spatial motion or reorientations, a solid-state source based on a microscopic emitter will in general emit all its photons in the same spatial mode.

    “Unless the emitter undergoes spatial motion or reorientations, a solid-state source based on a microscopic emitter will in general emit all its photons in the same spatial mode.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The linewidth takes its minimum possible value only when dephasing is negligible, i.e. when T2* = ∞; in that case one has a lifetime-limited linewidth.

    “takes its minimum possible value only when dephasing is negligible, i.e. when T * 2 = ∞.In that case, one has a lifetime-limited linewidth.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Two photons consecutively emitted by the same source, or two photons from independent emitters, can display number-interference or coalescence, provided they are sufficiently indistinguishable.

    “Two photons consecutively emitted by the same source, or two photons from independent emitters, can display number-interference or coalescence, provided they are sufficiently indistinguishable (see section 2.4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Bell's inequality was later proved experimentally to be violated, in agreement with standard quantum-mechanical predictions.

    “Bell's inequality was later proved experimentally to be violated, in agreement with standard quantum-mechanical predictions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The PNS attack can be performed when the losses Bob expects because of the fibre equal those introduced by Eve's blocking photons, that is when T AB μ < μ 2 /2, or when the transmission of the Alice-Bob line is less than μ/2.

    “Thus, the PNS attack can be performed when the losses that Bob expects because of the fibre are equal to those introduced by Eve's blocking photons, that is when T AB µ < µ 2 /2, or when the transmission of the Alice-Bob line is less than µ/2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Eve has unlimited technological power within the laws of physics.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    To show that Bell's inequality is violated in a two-particle experiment, it is necessary to perform a statistical experiment; the violation cannot be demonstrated with a single measurement.

    “To show that Bell's inequality is violated in a two-particle experiment, it is necessary to perform a statistical experiment: the violation cannot be demonstrated with a single measurement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Efficient single-photon sources will in principle improve the random-number generation rate.

    “Efficient single-photon sources will in principle improve the generation rate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Quantum correlations arising from entanglement are stronger than classical correlations, for example those which would arise from hidden variables.

    “Indeed, the quantum correlations arising from entanglement are stronger than classical correlations, for example, those which would arise from hidden variables (Bell 1965, Clauser andShimony 1978).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bell 1965

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Clauser andShimony 1978

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Aspect et al (1982) used two-channel polarizers and gave an unambiguous violation of Bell's inequalities by tens of standard deviations, and a perfect agreement with quantum mechanics.

    “It gave an unambiguous violation of Bell's inequalities by tens of standard deviations, and a perfect agreement with quantum mechanics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Aspect et al 1982a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Aspect et al 1982b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Alice may want to decrease the number of two-photon pulses by attenuating her pulses further, but she will be limited by the dark counts of Bob's detectors: μT AB η det > p dark.

    “Alice may want to decrease the number of two-photon pulses by attenuating her pulses further, but she will be limited by the dark counts of Bob's detectors:”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The second loophole arises from the weakness of the detection yield in all experiments so far.

    “The second loophole arises from the weakness of the detection yield in all experiments so far.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The recorded photon pairs in Bell tests are an unbiased sample of the ensemble.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The first loophole has now been closed, first in an experiment by Aspect et al (1982a) and more recently by Zeilinger's group (Weihs et al 1998).

    “This loophole has now been closed, first in an experiment by Aspect et al (1982a) where the directions of polarization analysis were switched after the photons left the source, and more recently by Zeilinger's group (Weihs et al 1998), who used sufficiently remote measurement stations, ultrafast and random analyser settings and two completely independent data acquisition systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Aspect et al 1982a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Weihs et al 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The optimal choice for Alice's rate of emission is μ = √ 2p dark, which leads to the combined transmission-and-detection limit T AB > √ 2p dark / η det.

    “The optimal choice for Alice's rate of emission is therefore µ = √ 2p dark , which leads to the combined transmission-and-detection limit,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    This experiment relies on two crucial features of the single-photon source: its ability to suppress multiphoton pulses and its ability to generate consecutively two indistinguishable photons.

    “This experiment relies on two crucial features of the single-photon source, namely its ability to suppress multiphoton pulses and its ability to generate consecutively two indistinguishable photons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The first loophole is the possibility of information exchange from one polarizer to the other, by unspecified processes.

    “The first one is the possibility of information exchange from one polarizer to the other, by unspecified processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The preparation of GHZ states with a single-photon source would provide clearer violation and open series of more accurate tests.

    “The preparation of GHZ states with a single-photon source would provide clearer violation and open series of more accurate tests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    To close the detection loophole, an ultimate experiment would need a much higher collection and detection efficiency of photon pairs, which could be achieved with an efficient source of single photons.

    “To close that loophole, an ultimate experiment would need a much higher collection and detection efficiency of photon pairs, which could be achieved with an efficient source of single photons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With an ideal single-photon source, Eve cannot apply the PNS attack and must use the simple intercept-resend attack.

    “As Eve cannot apply the PNS attack, she must use the simple intercept-resend attack.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Eve has unlimited technological power within the laws of physics.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    From a strictly logical point of view, the Bell tests still leave two subtle loopholes.

    “Yet, from a strictly logical point of view, they still leave two subtle loopholes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The free-space transmission of quantum-encrypted signals reached first a distance of 150 m and then exceeded 1 km under favourable conditions such as night-time.

    “The free-space transmission of quantum-encrypted signals reached first a distance of 150 m as reported in Jacobs and Franson (1996) and then exceeded 1 km under favourable conditions such as night-time (Buttler et al 1998, 2000, Gorman et al 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jacobs and Franson (1996)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Buttler et al 1998, 2000, Gorman et al 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In the first experiment with faint laser pulses, 30 cm of air separated Alice and Bob.

    “In this first experiment with faint laser pulses, 30 cm of air separated Alice and Bob.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bennett et al 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Later, in the mid-1980s, atoms were coupled to single mirrors, planar cavities or spherical Fabry-Perot resonators.

    “Later, in the mid-1980s, atoms were coupled to single mirrors, planar cavities or spherical Fabry-Perot resonators (Kleppner 1981, Goy et al 1983, Gabrielse and Dehmelt 1985, De Martini et al 1987, Heinzen et al 1987).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kleppner 1981

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Goy et al 1983

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gabrielse and Dehmelt 1985

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Advances in microfabrication techniques enabled the construction of high-quality semiconductor micropost and microdisc microcavities in the late 1980s and early 1990s and triggered series of experiments on solid-state cavity-quantum-electrodynamics.

    “Advances in microfabrication techniques enabled the construction of high-quality semiconductor micropost and microdisc microcavities in the late 1980s and early 1990s and triggered series of experiments on solid-state cavity-quantum-electrodynamics (CQED) (Yamamoto et al 1989, Jewell et al 1991, McCall et al 1992, Gérard et al 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Yamamoto et al 1989

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jewell et al 1991

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McCall et al 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In order to efficiently generate single photons, the quantum emitter is coupled to a resonant mode of a high-quality factor cavity.

    “In order to efficiently generate single photons, the quantum emitter is coupled to a resonant mode of a high-quality factor cavity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lütkenhaus (2000) gives analytical expressions of the minimum amount of transmission to ensure secrecy, taking error-correcting and privacy-amplifying algorithms into account, and compares attenuated laser pulses and a single-photon source under these conditions.

    “Lütkenhaus (2000) gives analytical expressions of the minimum amount of transmission to ensure secrecy, taking these algorithms into account, and compares the cases of attenuated laser pulses and of a single-photon source under these conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lütkenhaus (2000)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Depending on the ratio of the coupling parameter g to the cavity-field decay rate γ cav and to the free-space decay rate γ 0, two regimes of coupling between the emitter and the cavity field can be distinguished: strong coupling for g > γ cav, γ 0 and weak coupling for g < γ cav, γ 0.

    “Depending on the ratio of the coupling parameter, g, to the cavity-field decay rate, γ cav , and to the free-space decay rate of equation ( 14), γ 0 = ω 3 µ 2 eg /3πε 0 hc 3 , we can distinguish two regimes of coupling between the emitter and the cavity field: strong coupling for g > γ cav , γ 0 and weak coupling for g < γ cav , γ 0 (Haroche 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Haroche 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Yamamoto's group reported enhancement of the emission rate from single quantum dots with a Purcell factor of F P ≈ 5.8, quality factors of the order of 1000 and mode volumes close to the fundamental limit λ 3.

    “Yamamoto's group (Pelton et al 2002, Vuckovic et al 2003) reported enhancement of the emission rate from single quantum dots with a Purcell factor of F P ≈ 5.8, quality factors of the order of 1000 and mode volumes close to the fundamental limit, λ 3 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pelton et al 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vuckovic et al 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The first demonstration of a QKD over a 1 km fibre has been reported by Muller et al (1993).

    “The first demonstration of a QKD over a 1 km fibre has been reported by Muller et al (1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Muller et al (1993) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    When the cavity decay time is shorter than the spontaneous decay time in vacuum (γ cav > γ 0, bad cavity limit), the spontaneous emission decay rate is enhanced and is given by Fermi's golden rule.

    “When the cavity decay time is shorter than the spontaneous decay time in vacuum (γ cav > γ 0 , bad cavity limit), the spontaneous emission decay rate is enhanced and is given by Fermi's golden rule (Yamamoto and Imamoglu 1999):”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yamamoto and Imamoglu 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    First experimental demonstrations of the inhibition and enhancement of a spontaneous emission rate were carried out in the 1970s with molecules such as europium complexes in Langmuir-Blodgett films deposited on metallic mirrors.

    “First experimental demonstrations of the inhibition and enhancement of a spontaneous emission rate were carried out in the 1970s with molecules such as europium complexes in Langmuir-Blodgett films deposited on metallic mirrors (Drexhage et al 1968, Kuhn 1970, Chance et al 1974).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Drexhage et al 1968 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kuhn 1970

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chance et al 1974

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The first experimental QKD was demonstrated in 1989, but the results were published only in 1992.

    “The first experimental QKD was demonstrated in 1989, but the results were published only in 1992 (Bennett et al 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bennett et al 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the strong coupling case, the emitter is coherently coupled to the cavity field, and spontaneous emission is reversible.

    “In the strong coupling case, the emitter is coherently coupled to the cavity field, and spontaneous emission is reversible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both systems were free-space demonstrations over short distances, 1 m and 50 m.

    “Both systems were free-space demonstrations over short distances, 1 m (Waks et al 2002) and 50 m (Beveratos et al 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Waks et al 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Beveratos et al 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The microscopic sources are built around a single emitting nanometric object (a nano-object), producing photon distributions which are very far from Poissonian.

    “These sources are built around a single emitting nanometric object (a nano-object), producing photon distributions which are very far from Poissonian.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The emission yield primarily depends on the photophysics of the nano-object, but it can be improved if spontaneous emission is enhanced, for example by the Purcell effect of a resonant cavity.

    “The emission yield primarily depends on the photophysics of the nano-object at hand, but it can be improved if spontaneous emission is enhanced, for example, by the Purcell effect of a resonant cavity (see section 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    A typical rate of pair generation into single-mode optical fibres, corresponding to 10 mW cw pump power, is 10 7 pairs per second.

    “A typical rate of pair generation into single-mode optical fibres, corresponding to 10 mW cw pump power, is 10 7 pairs per second.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Faint laser pulses and parametric sources of entangled pairs deliver Poisson distributions of photons (or of photon pairs), from which multi-photon events can never be entirely suppressed.

    “Faint laser pulses and parametric sources of entangled pairs deliver Poisson distributions of photons (or of photon pairs), from which multi-photon events can never be entirely suppressed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In most cases, the probability density of emitting two photons at the same time can be completely neglected, whereas it is still high for an attenuated Poisson source with the same brightness.

    “In most cases, for example, the probability density of emitting two photons at the same time can be completely neglected, whereas it is still high for an attenuated Poisson source with the same brightness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    To obtain the same brightness with attenuated laser pulses (with a comparable fraction of two-photon events, n = 0.02), the repetition rate should be 50 MHz, leading to a 50 times higher rate of dark counts than with the parametric source.

    “In order to obtain the same brightness with attenuated laser pulses (with a comparable fraction of two-photon events, n = 0.02), the repetition rate should be 50 MHz, leading to a 50 times higher rate of dark counts than with the parametric source.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The macroscopic sources give a Poisson distribution of photons and must be strongly attenuated to reduce the probability of obtaining two or more photons.

    “The macroscopic sources we just discussed give a Poisson distribution of photons and must be strongly attenuated to reduce the probability of obtaining two or more photons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The whispering-gallery modes of these cavities present higher quality factors (in the 10 4 range) but relatively larger mode volumes so that the Purcell factors were comparable (F P ≈ 6) with those obtained in the micropost cavities.

    “The whispering-gallery modes (WGMs) of these cavities present higher quality factors (in the 10 4 range) but relatively larger mode volumes so that the Purcell factors were comparable (F P ≈ 6) with those obtained in the micropost cavities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Michler et al 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    They observed a strong anticorrelation between the triggered detections on the two sides of the beam splitter, which was a clear signature of a particle-like behaviour of the single photon.

    “They observed a strong anticorrelation between the triggered detections on the two sides of the beam splitter, which was a clear signature of a particle-like behaviour of the single photon.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grangier et al 1986 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    To achieve emission at a high repetition rate, and to avoid excitation events in which no photons are emitted, two conditions have to be fulfilled: the emitting state must be prepared at the end of the excitation cycle with as high a probability as possible, and the emission quantum yield of the nano-object must be as high as possible.

    “In order to achieve emission at a high repetition rate, and in order to avoid excitation events in which no photons are emitted, two conditions have to be fulfilled:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The optimal n value depends on the transmission losses and on assumptions on the eavesdropper's technology (n ≈ 0.1 is a typical value).

    “The optimal n value depends on the transmission losses and on assumptions on the eavesdropper's technology ( n ≈ 0.1 is a typical value).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Besides the heaviness and difficulty of operation of the experimental set-up, the atomic cascade sources suffer from a rather low brightness and from a loss of the polarization correlation when the photons are emitted back to back due to the recoil of the atom.

    “Besides the heaviness and difficulty of operation of the experimental set-up, the atomic cascade sources suffer from a rather low brightness and from a loss of the polarization correlation when the photons are emitted back to back (due to the recoil of the atom) (Santos 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Santos 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Incoherent pumping processes rely on a fast relaxation step to prepare the excited state.

    “Incoherent pumping.These processes rely on a fast relaxation step to prepare the excited state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    With type-II phase matching, the signal and idler photons have orthogonal polarizations and are emitted into two cones, one ordinary and the other extraordinary polarized.

    “With type-II phase matching, the signal and idler photons have orthogonal polarizations.They are emitted into two cones, one ordinary, the other extraordinary polarized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The dark count rate increases with the laser's modulation rate, and the ratio of detected photons to dark counts (i.e. the signal-to-noise ratio) decreases with n.

    “Therefore, the dark count rate increases with the laser's modulation rate, and the ratio of detected photons to dark counts (i.e. the signal-to-noise ratio) decreases with n (Gisin et al 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gisin et al 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    If more than one atom is present, the number of simultaneously emitted photons can exceed one, which requires that the average number of atoms be very low.

    “If more than one atom is present, the number of simultaneously emitted photons can exceed one, which requires that the average number of atoms be very low (Kimble 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kimble 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The key requirement for such networks is their ability to interconvert stationary and flying qubits and to transmit flying qubits between specified locations.

    “The key requirement for such networks is their ability to interconvert stationary and flying qubits and to transmit flying qubits between specified locations (Di Vincenzo 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Di Vincenzo 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The lifetime of a trapped atom in the presence of the driving fields limits the number of generated photons to about 10 4, a few hundreds of which are detected.

    “The lifetime of a trapped atom in the presence of the driving fields (pumping p (t) and repumping fields) limits the number of generated photons to about 10 4 , a few hundreds of which are detected.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McKeever et al 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As the final state |b, 0 is not coupled to the one-photon manifold, the atom cannot be excited again, which limits the number of photons per pump pulse and atom to one.

    “As this state is not coupled to the one-photon manifold, the atom cannot be excited again, which limits the number of photons per pump pulse and atom to one.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Phase-matching allows one to choose the wavelength and determine the bandwidth of the down-converted photons.

    “Phase-matching allows one to choose the wavelength and determine the bandwidth of the down-converted photons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In the absence of a Doppler effect and of collisions with residual gas, which is the case in practice for cold atoms and trapped ions, the transitions are narrow and lifetime-limited.

    “In the absence of a Doppler effect and of collisions with residual gas, which is the case in practice for cold atoms and trapped ions, the transitions are narrow and lifetime-limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    It is possible to prepare the emitting state with resonant light, but one then has to separate the emitted photon from the excited ones, either temporally by a time-delayed detection or spectrally by detecting a red-shifted photon emitted on a vibrational level of the ground state.

    “It is also possible to prepare the emitting state with resonant light, but one then has to separate the emitted photon from the excited ones, either temporally, by a timedelayed detection, or spectrally, by detecting a red-shifted photon emitted on a vibrational level of the ground state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although much is known from conventional ensemble spectroscopy about a huge number of colour centres in a variety of hosts, only a handful of systems have led to observations of individual defects, and even fewer have been shown to possess the photophysical properties suitable for single-photon generation.

    “Although much is known from conventional ensemble spectroscopy about a huge number of colour centres in a variety of hosts (Crawford et al 1972, Gellermann 1991), only a handful of systems have led to observations of individual defects, and even fewer have been shown to possess the photophysical properties suitable for single-photon generation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Crawford et al 1972 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gellermann 1991

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Therefore, the emitted wavepackets will be transform-limited, and the photons will be perfectly indistinguishable.

    “Therefore, the emitted wavepackets will be transform-limited, and the photons will be perfectly indistinguishable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A major advantage of inorganic materials, and in particular of diamond, is their mechanical stiffness and stability.

    “A major advantage of inorganic materials, and in particular of diamond, is their mechanical stiffness and stability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In contrast to emitters in condensed matter, atoms offer no possibility for fast relaxation between levels in the picosecond range.

    “In contrast to emitters in condensed matter, they offer no possibility for fast relaxation between levels in the picosecond range.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The photophysical properties of molecules make them interesting models for understanding the behaviour of strongly confined electron systems such as colour centres and semiconductor nanoparticles.

    “The photophysical properties of molecules make them interesting models for understanding the behaviour of strongly confined electron systems such as colour centres and semiconductor nanoparticles, to be discussed later.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Atoms and ions never emit two or more photons (with the same wavelength) simultaneously and consequently present strong antibunching.

    “They never emit two or more photons (with the same wavelength) simultaneously and consequently present strong antibunching.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    A big advantage of atoms is that their states are perfectly reproducible and well-known, including the hyperfine structure of the levels.

    “A big advantage of atoms is that their states are perfectly reproducible and well-known, including the hyperfine structure of the levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    With the right atom or ion, transitions can be found throughout the visible and near-IR parts of the spectrum (Cs at 852 nm, Rb at 780 nm).

    “With the right atom or ion, transitions can be found throughout the visible and near-IR parts of the spectrum (Cs at 852 nm, Rb at 780 nm).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The main challenge for attaining a single-photon source based on atoms is the isolation, manipulation and trapping of single atoms, which requires sophisticated and expensive setups including high-resolution stabilized lasers at several frequencies and ultra-high vacuum.

    “The main challenge for the attainment of a single-photon source is in the isolation, manipulation and trapping of single atoms, which requires sophisticated and expensive setups, including high-resolution stabilized lasers at several frequencies, and ultra-high vacuum.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Under low-temperature conditions, the fluorescence of single molecules shows deep antibunching and damped Rabi oscillations.

    “Under low-temperature conditions, the fluorescence of single molecules shows deep antibunching and damped Rabi oscillations (Basché et al 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Basché et al 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Only the ZPL, the bluest emission at low temperatures, is narrow because its width is determined by the long lifetime of the excited state, nanoseconds.

    “Only the ZPL, the bluest emission at low temperatures, is narrow because its width is determined by the long lifetime of the excited state, nanoseconds.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Typical radiative lifetimes of allowed atomic transitions are about 30 ns, corresponding to a linewidth of a few megahertz.

    “Typical radiative lifetimes of allowed atomic transitions are about 30 ns, corresponding to a linewidth of a few megahertz.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Singlet-singlet annihilation very efficiently prevents emission of two photons at the same time by a coupled system and explains the strong antibunching observed in multiple chromophores and in conjugated polymers.

    “It very efficiently prevents emission of two photons at the same time by a coupled system and explains the strong antibunching observed in multiple chromophores (Hofkens et al 2003) and in conjugated polymers (Lee et al 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hofkens et al 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lee et al 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The fluorescence of single molecules at room temperature shows very strong antibunching, due to the very short lifetime of higher excited levels.

    “The fluorescence of single molecules at room temperature also shows very strong antibunching (Ambrose et al 1997, Fleury et al 2000), due to the very short lifetime of higher excited levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ambrose et al 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fleury et al 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Defects in low-band-gap semiconductors have been proposed as sources of single photons.

    “Defects in low-band-gap semiconductors have been proposed as sources of single photons (Strauf et al 2002) and will be briefly discussed in section 6.6.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Strauf et al 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Since there is only one atom in the cavity and since only one passage is performed at each laser pulse, only one photon is produced in the cavity.

    “Since there is only one atom in the cavity and since only one passage is performed at each laser pulse, only one photon is produced in the cavity (see figure 13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The first single colour centre ever detected was a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centre in diamond, at room temperature.

    “The first single colour centre ever detected was a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centre in diamond (Gruber et al 1997), at room temperature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gruber et al 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    To obtain indistinguishable, lifetime-limited photons from molecules, one has either to select the emission of the ZPL, losing 80-90% of the fluorescence, or to stimulate the ZPL emission by coupling to a resonant cavity, which is not easy for molecular systems in condensed matter and has never been done so far.

    “To obtain indistinguishable, lifetime-limited photons, one has either to select the emission of the ZPL, thus losing 80-90% of the fluorescence, or to stimulate the ZPL emission by coupling to a resonant cavity (section 4), which is not easy for molecular systems in condensed matter, and has never been done so far.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although the electronic wavefunctions and photophysical properties of colour centres are very similar to those of organic molecules, their photostability is much improved, both because of the rigidity of the diamond lattice and because of the protection it affords against small aggressive molecules such as oxygen.

    “Although the electronic wavefunctions and photophysical properties of colour centres are very similar to those of organic molecules, their photostability is much improved, both because of the rigidity of the diamond lattice and because of the protection it affords against small aggressive molecules such as oxygen.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The luminescence spectrum of the NV centre is a broad band (more than 1000 cm-1, extending from 640 to 720 nm), with a weak and rather narrow ZPL (at 640 nm, width about 50 cm-1), still visible at room temperature thanks to the stiffness of the diamond lattice.

    “The luminescence spectrum of this defect is a broad band (more than 1000 cm -1 , extending from 640 to 720 nm), with a weak and rather narrow ZPL (at 640 nm, width about 50 cm -1 ), still visible at room temperature thanks to the stiffness of the diamond lattice (Gruber et al 1997).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gruber et al 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The whole oscillator strength is concentrated in one single transition, and because of the absence of non-radiative channels, the fluorescence quantum yield is unity.

    “The whole oscillator strength is concentrated in one single transition, and because of the absence of non-radiative channels, the fluorescence quantum yield is unity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The stability of the NV-centres is excellent, even at room temperature, because of the rigidity of the diamond lattice.

    “The stability of the NV-centres is excellent, even at room temperature, because of the rigidity of the diamond lattice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The use of nanocrystals (size 50-100 nm) containing one or a few NV centres improves the collection efficiency by more than a factor of 2 and additionally reduces the background.

    “This improves the collection efficiency by more than a factor of 2 and additionally reduces the background.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Radiative recombination is the main relaxation channel for mono-exciton states in nanocrystals and therefore occurs with near-unity quantum yield.

    “Radiative recombination is the main relaxation channel for mono-exciton states and therefore occurs with near-unity quantum yield.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Many technical problems must still be solved before single-photon sources become as standard and user-friendly as lasers are.

    “Many technical problems must still be solved before single-photon sources become as standard and user-friendly as lasers are.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The emitting transition dipoles of nanocrystals are polarized in a plane, leading to a radiation pattern distinctly different from that of a molecule.

    “The emitting transition dipoles are polarized in a plane, leading to a radiation pattern distinctly different from that of a molecule (Empedocles et al 1999, Chung et al 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Empedocles et al 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chung et al 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The off-times of nanocrystal blinking follow power-law distributions and can be extremely long.

    “These off-times follow power-law distributions (Kuno et al 2001) and can be extremely long.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kuno et al 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The well-controlled growth and environment ensure that the surface of the dots is very clean and that the radiative recombination rates and the photostability are excellent.

    “The well-controlled growth and environment ensure that the surface of the dots is very clean and that the radiative recombination rates and the photostability are excellent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The emission line of nanocrystals narrows significantly at low temperatures, down to about 1 cm-1 (0.1 meV) in the best cases, but never reaches the lifetime limit, probably because of spectral diffusion.

    “The emission line narrows significantly at low temperatures, down to about 1 cm -1 (0.1 meV) in the best cases (Empedocles et al 1996), but never reaches the lifetime limit, probably because of spectral diffusion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Empedocles et al 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Just as in organic fluorophores, multiple excitations in the NV centre are excluded by the small size of the system and Kasha's rule.

    “Just as in organic fluorophores, multiple excitations are excluded by the small size of the system and Kasha's rule.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Nanocrystals of II-VI semiconductors such as ZnS have been studied as individual emitters for several years, but antibunching in their luminescence was discovered only recently.

    “Nanocrystals of II-VI semiconductors such as ZnS have been studied as individual emitters for several years (Empedocles et al 1996), but antibunching in their luminescence was discovered only recently (Lounis et al 2000, Michler et al 2000, Messin et al 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Empedocles et al 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lounis et al 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Michler et al 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As soon as an additional charge carrier (or exciton) is present in a nanocrystal, its interaction with the emitter exciton leads to highly excited electron or hole states, for which many one-phonon relaxation channels exist, and the electronic energy is thus very efficiently dissipated non-radiatively.

    “As soon as an additional charge carrier (or exciton) is present, however, its interaction with the emitter exciton leads to highly excited electron or hole states, for which many onephonon relaxation channels exist.The electronic energy is thus very efficiently dissipated non-radiatively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The emission quantum yield of nanocrystals was recently shown to be very close to unity, but only during the bright periods of their blinking.

    “The emission quantum yield was recently shown to be very close to unity, but only during the bright periods of their blinking (Brokmann et al 2004b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brokmann et al 2004b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Spectral diffusion and the very long luminescence lifetime are two weak points of nanocrystals for low-temperature applications as single-photon sources.

    “Spectral diffusion and the very long luminescence lifetime are two weak points of nanocrystals for low-temperature applications as single-photon sources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In a neutral, singly excited nanocrystal, there are no levels in the gap to which electron or hole can relax; therefore a non-radiative transition requires coupling to a large number of phonons at once, and the matrix element for such a multi-phonon transition is exceedingly small.

    “In a neutral, singlyexcited nanocrystal, there are no levels in the gap to which electron or hole can relax.Therefore, a non-radiative transition requires coupling to a large number of phonons at once.The matrix element for such a multi-phonon transition is exceedingly small.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Another colour centre of diamond, the nickel-nitrogen complex (NE8), was recently proposed as an alternative to the NV-centre, with a similarly perfect photostability.

    “Another colour centre of diamond was recently proposed as an alternative to the NV-centre (Gaebel et al 2004), with a similarly perfect photostability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gaebel et al 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The efficient annihilation of multi-excitations is the key mechanism of the strong antibunching observed in nanocrystals and enables their use as single-photon sources.

    “The efficient annihilation of multi-excitations is the key mechanism of the strong antibunching observed in nanocrystals and enables their use as single-photon sources (Lounis et al 2000, Brokmann et al 2004a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lounis et al 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Brokmann et al 2004a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The emitter has to be chosen according to the application in view.

    “Our main conclusion is that the emitter has to be chosen according to the application in view.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In contrast to nanocrystals, multiple excitations can coexist in self-assembled quantum dots and can also coexist with charge carriers, leading to characteristic bi- or multi-exciton lines and to trion or even multi-charged lines when an exciton is combined with an electron or a hole.

    “In contrast to nanocrystals, multiple excitations can coexist in self-assembled quantum dots and can also coexist with charge carriers, leading to characteristic bi-or multi-exciton lines and to trion or even multi-charged lines when an exciton is combined with an electron or a hole (Michler 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Michler 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The breadth of the NV emission band indicates that the photons produced are very far from being lifetime-limited and therefore are not indistinguishable.

    “The breadth of the emission band indicates that the photons produced are very far from being lifetime-limited and therefore are not indistinguishable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    With high-efficiency cavities, localized electronic states of molecules or impurity-bound excitons in semiconductors could present a spectral luminescence purity close to that of atoms.

    “With high-efficiency cavities, localized electronic states of molecules or impurity-bound excitons in semiconductors could present a spectral luminescence purity close to that of atoms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    It is a challenging aim to produce entangled pairs of single photons from a compact, solid-state device.

    “It is a challenging aim to produce entangled pairs of single photons from a compact, solid-state device.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Many quantum processing schemes rely on entangled pairs of particles.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Higher collection and transmission efficiencies and higher detection yields are indispensable for fully benefiting from the quantum cornucopia.

    “Higher collection and transmission efficiencies and higher detection yields are indispensable for fully benefiting from the quantum cornucopia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    A possible scheme would be the emission of polarization-entangled photons from a bi-exciton state in a single quantum dot.

    “A possible scheme would be the emission of polarization-entangled photons from a bi-exciton state in a single quantum dot (Benson et al 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Benson et al 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The current setups must be downsized and simplified before routine use can be envisaged.

    “However, the current setups must be downsized and simplified before routine use can be envisaged.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The easiest solution is to rely on cavity enhancement of the current emitters to decrease their emission lifetimes down to some tens of picoseconds.

    “The easiest solution is therefore to rely on cavity enhancement of the current emitters to decrease their emission lifetimes down to some tens of picoseconds.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    More sophisticated sources, in which successive photons could be brought to interfere, can in principle be built around single atoms or single quantum dots.

    “More sophisticated sources, in which successive photons could be brought to interfere, can in principle be built around single atoms or single quantum dots.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Quantum cryptography over large fibre distances will also require progress in fibre transmission.

    “Quantum cryptography over large fibre distances will also require progress in fibre transmission.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The realization closest to us seems to be quantum cryptography.

    “If the realization closest to us seems to be quantum cryptography, the field of quantum information processing is a quickly moving one, and new ideas keep cropping up.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Efficient and dedicated detectors must be built for near-infrared communication wavelengths.

    “While silicon detectors almost reach unity yield in the red part of the spectrum, efficient and dedicated detectors must be built for near-infrared communication wavelengths.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Silicon detectors almost reach unity yield in the red part of the spectrum.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    All quantum processes consist of an intimate interaction (sometimes called transaction) between emission and detection.

    “Even more importantly, all quantum processes consist of an intimate interaction (sometimes called transaction (Cramer 1986)) between emission and detection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cramer 1986

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Coupling to a resonant cavity can improve the efficiency and the characteristics of the single photons.

    “Coupling to a resonant cavity can improve the efficiency and the characteristics of the single photons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The manipulation of higher number-states would benefit from detectors capable of distinguishing between multi-photon states, for example superconducting bolometers.

    “The manipulation of higher number-states would benefit from detectors capable of distinguishing between multi-photon states, for example superconducting bolometers (Cabrera et al 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cabrera et al 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    A similar effect is observed in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, for diffusing fluorescent dye molecules in solution.

    “A similar effect is observed in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, for diffusing fluorescent dye molecules in solution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The reduced mode volumes of photonic crystal microcavities would be particularly interesting for reaching the strong-coupling regime in the solid state.

    “The reduced mode volumes of photoniccrystal microcavities would be particularly interesting for reaching the strong-coupling regime in the solid state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Progress in the control of quantum processes has been very fast lately on the sources' side, but it cannot be separated from progress on the detectors' side.

    “Progress in the control of quantum processes has been very fast lately on the sources' side, but it cannot be separated from progress on the detectors' side.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    The manipulation of single photons has been made possible by the existence of single-photon detectors.

    “The manipulation of single photons has been made possible by the existence of single-photon detectors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    As long as its coherence has not been destroyed by interaction with a macroscopic bath, any quantum process must be considered as open to superposition and interference.

    “As long as its coherence has not been destroyed by interaction with a macroscopic bath, any quantum process must be considered as open to superposition and interference.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
142 of 142
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Number-states of light, except the vacuum state, are unfamiliar and very hard to obtain in practice.

    “Except for the trivial vacuum-state (n = 0), number-states of light are unfamiliar and very hard to obtain in practice.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The detection of weak absorption signals is in general hampered by photon noise.

    “The detection of weak absorption signals is in general hampered by photon noise, i.e. fluctuations of the number of photons.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    An eavesdropper can escape detection while attempting to extract information from a statistical mixture of number-states, but not from a well-prepared number-state.

    “An eavesdropper can escape detection while attempting to extract information from a statistical mixture of number-states, but not from a well-prepared number-state.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Real photon-counting detectors have limitations such as dead-time and after-pulses.

    “Unfortunately, real photon-counting detectors have their limitations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For most room-temperature emitters, the coherence time is extremely short, often shorter than picoseconds.

    “For most room-temperature emitters, however, the coherence time is extremely short (often shorter than picoseconds).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For most systems in condensed matter at room temperature, the dephasing time is by several orders of magnitude shorter than the excited state lifetime, so the linewidth is very far from being lifetime-limited.

    “For most systems in condensed matter at room temperature, the dephasing time is by several orders of magnitude shorter than the excited state lifetime, i.e. the linewidth is very far from being lifetime-limited.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In both pseudorandom and physical random number generation approaches, systematic errors and perturbations lead to deviations from a truly random distribution of numbers.

    “In both approaches, systematic errors and perturbations lead to deviations from a truly random distribution of numbers.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The recorded photon pairs in Bell tests are an unbiased sample of the ensemble.

    “One always assumes that the recorded pairs are an unbiased sample of the ensemble.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Eve is supposed to possess perfect detectors and to be able to forward signals to Bob without any loss.

    “In particular, Eve is supposed to possess perfect detectors and to be able to forward signals to Bob without any loss.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Alice and Bob may only use current technology.

    “Alice and Bob, on the other hand, may only use current technology.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Eve has unlimited technological power within the laws of physics.

    “If we endow Eve with unlimited technological power within the laws of physics”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The cavity mode density is a normalized Lorentzian with a width of ω 0 /Q.

    “Assuming a normalized Lorentzian mode density with a width of ω 0 /Q for the cavity”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Atoms are usually very stable under laser illumination and, unlike large molecules and semiconductor systems, do not present long-lived dark states (or can be recycled out of them).

    “Atoms are usually very stable under laser illumination.In contrast to large molecules and semiconductor systems, they do not present long-lived dark states (or if they do, they can be recycled out of them).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The operation time of an atom-based single-photon source is limited by the dwell time of the atom in the cavity mode, up to seconds for a cold atom in a trap.

    “The operation time of an atom-based single-photon source is limited by the dwell time of the atom in the cavity mode, up to seconds for a cold atom in a trap.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some organic dyes and aromatic molecules emit fluorescence with a high quantum yield and were the first condensed-matter systems for which antibunching was demonstrated.

    “Some organic dyes and aromatic molecules emit fluorescence with a high quantum yield and were the first condensed-matter systems for which antibunching was demonstrated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Organic molecules less than a nanometre in size can present optical transitions in the visible or near-IR.

    “Organic molecules less than a nanometre in size can present optical transitions in the visible or near-IR.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Compared with atoms, the eigenstates of molecules in condensed matter involve vibrations and phonons, in addition to electronic states.

    “As compared with those of atoms, the eigenstates of molecules in condensed matter involve vibrations and phonons, in addition to electronic states.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Zero-phonon linewidths are often lifetime-limited at low temperatures.

    “Zero-phonon linewidths are often lifetime-limited at low temperatures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A typical Debye-Waller factor is 0.1, and it decreases quickly for temperatures higher than that of liquid helium, while the width of the ZPL increases steeply because of phonon-induced dephasing processes.

    “A typical value is 0.1, and it decreases quickly for temperatures higher than that of liquid helium, while the width of the ZPL increases steeply because of phonon-induced dephasing processes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Fluorescence is emitted from the lowest vibration state of the excited electronic state towards vibrational levels of the ground state, giving rise to vibrational fluorescence lines and phonon sidebands.

    “Fluorescence is emitted from the lowest vibration state of the excited electronic state towards vibrational levels of the ground state, giving rise to vibrational fluorescence lines (shifted to the red with respect to the ZPL by vibration frequencies, 100-3000 cm -1 ) and to phonon sidebands (width about 100 cm -1 ).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The width of the other vibronic lines is limited by the lifetime of the vibrations, about a few picoseconds.

    “The width of the other vibronic lines is limited by the lifetime of the vibrations, about a few picoseconds.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The molecular transition is a linear dipole with an oscillator strength of about unity, which corresponds to a spontaneous emission lifetime of a few nanoseconds and to a ZPL linewidth of about 30 MHz.

    “The molecular transition is a linear dipole with an oscillator strength of about unity, which corresponds to a spontaneous emission lifetime of a few nanoseconds and to a ZPL linewidth of about 30 MHz.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    III-V semiconductor heterostructures benefit from knowhow developed for electronic microlithography, by which whole emitting structures, including the resonant cavity, can be produced in one microfabrication process.

    “In the latter class of solid-state sources, III-V semiconductor heterostructures benefit from all the knowhow developed for electronic microlithography, by which whole emitting structures, including the resonant cavity, can be produced in one microfabrication process.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A simple photon gun based on a single diamond nanocrystal with a single colour centre at the focus of a microscope objective already exists.

    “The simplest version of a photon gun, based on a single diamond nanocrystal with a single colour centre at the focus of a microscope objective, already exists today.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Such simple devices were already employed in early demonstrations of QKD.

    “Such devices were already employed in early demonstrations of QKD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Silicon detectors almost reach unity yield in the red part of the spectrum.

    “While silicon detectors almost reach unity yield in the red part of the spectrum, efficient and dedicated detectors must be built for near-infrared communication wavelengths.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many quantum processing schemes rely on entangled pairs of particles.

    “Many quantum processing schemes rely on entangled pairs of particles.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Large aggregates of molecules, for example J-aggregates, present enhanced fluorescence rates due to cooperative interference of the molecules in a coherence domain.

    “Large aggregates of molecules, for example J-aggregates, present enhanced fluorescence rates due to cooperative interference of the molecules in a coherence domain.”
28 of 28

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New generations of single-photon sources have been developed based on solid-state devices, atoms, molecules and ions.

    “New generations of single-photon sources have been developed: they are based on solid-state devices, atoms, molecules and ions etc. (see Lounis and Orrit, (2005) for a recent review).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Lounis and Orrit, (2005)

  • In previous pulsed above-bandgap or p-shell excitation experiments, the photon coherence time had to be much larger than the incoherent carrier relaxation time jitter (about tens of ps) to obtain good two-photon interference visibility, which fundamentally limited radiative lifetime shortening through the Purcell effect.

    “Lastly, it is important to note that in the previous pulsed above-bandgap or p-shell excitation experiment, the photon coherence time had to be much larger than the incoherent carrier relaxation time jitter (about tens of ps) in order to obtain a good two-photon interference visibility [6], which fundamentally put a limit on the radiative lifetime shortening through the Purcell effect.”
  • Incoherent pumping via above band-gap or p-shell excitation typically causes reduced photon coherence times due to homogeneous broadening and uncontrolled emission time jitter, leading to decreased photon indistinguishability.

    “The method of incoherent pumping (via above band-gap or p-shell excitation) typically causes reduced photon coherence times due to homogeneous broadening of the excited state [5] and uncontrolled emission time jitter from the nonradiative high-level to s-shell relaxation [6], leading to a decrease of photon indistinguishability.”
  • The observed near-radiative-lifetime-limited coherence is consistent with the prediction that pure s-shell resonant excitation can eliminate dephasings associated with incoherent excitation methods.

    “This is consistent with the prediction that the pure s-shell resonant excitation can eliminate dephasings associated with the incoherent excitation methods [5,6].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Changing the relative phase cannot produce all four Bell states

    Minor

    Varying the phase in the displayed state changes the relative phase of |H1V2⟩ and |V1H2⟩. It cannot produce the paper's |φ+⟩ and |φ−⟩ states, which instead contain |H1H2⟩ and |V1V2⟩.

  • Bell-state correlation is not opposite in every polarization basis

    Minor

    The stated |ψ+⟩ state gives opposite results in the horizontal-vertical basis, but the same results in the diagonal basis. Thus Bob does not always obtain the opposite result when he uses Alice's basis.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Alspector J, 1989, Adv. Neutral Inform. Process. Syst., 1, 741
  2. Bell J S, 1965, Physics (NY), 1, 195
  3. Bennett C H Brassard G, 1984, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing
  4. Bennett C H, 1985, IBM Tech. Discl. Bull., 28, 3153
  5. Cohen-Tannoudji C, 1992, Atom-Photon Interactions
  6. Drexhage K H, 1974, Progress in Optics, XII, 165
  7. Drummond P D, 1999, Quantum Squeezing
  8. Gammon D, 1996, Science, 87, 273
  9. Haroche S, 1992, Les Houches session LIII, ?Fundamental Systems in Quantum Optics?
  10. Loudon R, 1983, The Quantum Theory of Light
  11. Planck M, 1900, Verh. Deutsch. Phys. Ges., 2, 202

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lounis, B., & Orrit, M.
Affiliations
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Reports on Progress in Physics
Published
2005-04-21
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
1129-1179
ISSN
  • 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6633
OpenAlex
W2058874525
Cited by
908
References
213
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 49
FWCI
14.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reports on Progress in Physics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
Keywords
single-photon sources, photon antibunching, quantum optics, quantum information processing, quantum cryptography, quantum computing, quantum communication, cavity quantum electrodynamics, Purcell effect, strong coupling, parametric down-conversion, organic compounds, defect centers, quantum dots, heterostructures, nanoscale emitters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review