The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research
Abstract
This review, written to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the International Journal of Science Education, revealed a period of changes in the theoretical views of the language arts, the perceived roles of language in science education, and the research approaches used to investigate oral and written language in science, science teaching, and learning. The early years were dominated by behavioralist and logico-mathematical interpretations of human learning and by reductionist research approaches, while the later years reflected an applied cognitive science and constructivist interpretations of learning and a wider array of research approaches that recognizes the holistic nature of teaching and learning. The early years focus on coding oral language into categories reflecting source of speech, functional purpose, level of question and response, reading research focused on the readability of textbooks using formulae and the reader's decoding skills, and writing research was not well documented since the advocates for writing in service of learning were grass roots practitioners and many science teachers were using writing as an evaluation technique. The advent of applied cognitive science and the constructivist perspectives ushered in interactive-constructive models of discourse, reading and writing that more clearly revealed the role of language in science and in science teaching and learning. A review of recent research revealed that the quantity and quality of oral interactions were low and unfocused in science classrooms; reading has expanded to consider comprehension strategies, metacognition, sources other than textbooks, and the design of inquiry environments for classrooms; and writing-to-learn science has focused on sequential writing tasks requiring transformation of ideas to enhance science learning. Several promising trends and future research directions flow from the synthesis of this 25-year period of examining the literacy component of science literacy - among them are critical listening and reading of various sources, multi-media presentations and representations, effective debate and argument, quality explanation and the role of information and communication technologies/environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
National Science Education Standards
Shea, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Geological Education · doi:10.5408/0022-1368-43.2.102 · Cited by 7,888
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5764 · Cited by 6,847
Strategies of Discourse Comprehension
Staczek, J. J., van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1985) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/326517 · Cited by 5,395
Talking science: language, learning, and values
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5211 · Cited by 3,996
The Journal of College Science Teaching
(1971) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed048p284 · Cited by 3,332
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543067001088 · Cited by 3,181
Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading
Barnett, M. A., Singer, H., & Ruddell, R. B. (1987) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/326762 · Cited by 3,086
The Psychology of Written Composition
Cumming, A., Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327270 · Cited by 2,807
Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery
Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., Thagard, P. R., & Smoliar, S. W. (1987) · IEEE Expert · doi:10.1109/mex.1987.4307100 · Cited by 2,305
Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3 · Cited by 2,164
Cited by
Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20035 · Cited by 1,596
Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks
Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831209333183 · Cited by 419
Learning to teach elementary school science as argument
Zembal‐Saul, C. (2009) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20325 · Cited by 215
Hall, L. A. (2010) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811011200708 · Cited by 76
Situmorang, M., Sitorus, M., Hutabarat, W., & Situmorang, Z. (2015) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v8n10p72 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Yore, L., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 689-725
- ISSN
- 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5289
- OpenAlex
- W2154273617
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 130
- FWCI
- 69.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09500690305018
- The paper
- Yore, L., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.