Cited by 303Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesScience Education and Pedagogy

From the general to the situated: three decades of metacognition

Georghiades, Petros·2004·International Journal of Science Education

Abstract

This paper discusses the notion of metacognition, which is usually defined as ‘cognitions about cognitions’, or ‘thinking about one's own thinking’. In so doing, it reviews the literature on metacognition over the past three decades, listing different definitions of the term and identifying diverse origins of processes metacognitive. Aspects of the nature of metacognition are discussed, highlighting some of its important yet problematic dimensions, and the potentially positive impact metacognition can have on the learning process is addressed. The paper also relates metacognition to the broader area of general thinking skills and discusses the appropriateness of practising metacognition with primary school children. The paper concludes with a synopsis of research in the outcomes of metacognition, in general, and in science education, in particular, highlighting recent interest in blending metacognitive thinking with science subject matter. Directions for research in science education with an interest in metacognition are also proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0950069032000119401

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improved metacognition helps individuals with management of time, focus, and effort, problem-solving, academic performance, emotional well-being, and overall decision-making.

    “Studies have shown that improved metacognition helps individuals with management of time, focus, and effort [212], problem-solving [67], academic performance [45,52,106,126,180,214], emotional well-being [200], and overall decision-making [206].”

    From The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as [67]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Georghiades, P.
Affiliations
Ministry of Education and Culture (CY)
Corresponding author
Georghiades, Petros
Venue
International Journal of Science Education
Published
2004-02-27
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
365-383
ISSN
  • 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5289
OpenAlex
W2090912502
Cited by
303
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
15.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
metacognition, metacognitive processes, metacognitive thinking, science education, elementary school students, thinking skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review