On the Nature of “Context” in Chemical Education
Open accessAbstract
Some of the most pressing problems currently facing chemical education throughout the world are rehearsed. It is suggested that if the notion of “context” is to be used as the basis for an address to these problems, it must enable a number of challenges to be met. Four generic models of “context” are identified that are currently used or that may be used in some form within chemical education as the basis for curriculum design. It is suggested that a model based on physical settings, together with their cultural justifications, and taught with a socio‐cultural perspective on learning, is likely to meet those challenges most fully. A number of reasons why the relative efficacies of these four models of approaches cannot be evaluated from the existing research literature are suggested. Finally, an established model for the representation of the development of curricula is used to discuss the development and evaluation of context‐based chemical curricula.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Visual representations can help reduce student difficulties when moving between the different representational levels if pupils know how to interpret them.
“Visual representations can help in reducing student difficulties when moving between the different representational levels (Gilbert, 2006) if pupils know how to interpret them (Pintó and Ametller, 2002).”
From An analysis of the visual representation of redox reactions and related content in Brazilian secondary school chemistry textbooks (2020) · cites this paper as Gilbert, 2006
Cites
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mapping the dark matter of context: A conceptual scoping review.
Bates, J., & Ellaway, R. H. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13034 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Yuriev, E., Burton, M. G., Knott, D., Terrill, A. E., Jackson, N. R. C., & Chen, S. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01499 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Onwu, G. O. M., & Mufundirwa, C. (2020) · African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education · doi:10.1080/18117295.2020.1816700 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Institute of Chemistry, U. O. S. P., Goes, L. F., Chen, X., Department of Biology and Chemistry, I. F. S. E., Nogueira, K. S. C., Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, C. B., Fernandez, C., Institute of Chemistry, U. O. S. P., Eilks, I., & Department of Biology and Chemistry, I. F. S. E. (2020) · Science Education International · doi:10.33828/sei.v31.i3.10 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Visual representations can help in reducing student difficulties when moving between the different representational levels (Gilbert, 2006) if pupils know how to interpret them (Pintó and Ametller, 2002).”
Background
- Authors
- Gilbert, J. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Reading (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gilbert, John K.
- ORCID
- Gilbert, John K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-07-14
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 957-976
- ISSN
- 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5289
- OpenAlex
- W1976988822
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 57.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
- CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Chemistry Education and Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
- Keywords
- contextual learning, chemistry education, curriculum development, physical environment, curriculum evaluation, chemistry curriculum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review