Cited by 105Science Education and PedagogyEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesGlobal Educational Reforms and Inequalities

Cram School Students’ Conceptions of Learning and Learning Science in Taiwan

Tsai, Chin‐Chung, Kuo, Pi‐Chu·2008·International Journal of Science Education

Abstract

The cram school in Taiwan offers additional after‐school instruction to enhance students’ academic performance, and it provides a unique educational context to investigate students’ perspectives toward learning. The purpose of this study was to explore 45 cram school students’ (around 14 years old) conceptions of learning and learning science. The research data were gathered from interviews with each of the students, and the interview responses were further analyzed by a phenomenographic method. It was found that most of these students conceptualized learning or learning science as memorizing school knowledge, preparing for tests, or practicing tutorial problems and processing calculations. This study also revealed that about 76% of the students expressed coherent views between conceptions of learning in general, and those of learning science in particular. Further analyses of student interview responses suggested that the students held a quantitative view of learning (science) and they tended to atomize school knowledge while learning (science). Their motivation for learning was mainly driven by external factors, such as examination scores, and they probably employed a surface approach to learning. Moreover, their conceptions of learning or learning science might imply a dualist epistemology for the nature of knowing and knowledge. This study also showed some evidence that the special educational context of cram schools might guide students develop certain conceptions of learning, thus leading to particular study and motivational approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09500690701191425

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The highly competitive examination system has led to a learning environment in which teaching and learning activities primarily focused on how to best prepare students for college entrance tests.

    “In particular, the highly competitive examination system has led to a learning environment in which teaching and learning activities primarily focused on how to best prepare students' for college entrance tests (Tsai and Kuo 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, C., & Kuo, P.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • National Pingtung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Tsai, Chin‐Chung
Venue
International Journal of Science Education
Published
2007-11-28
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
353-375
ISSN
  • 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5289
OpenAlex
W1994769353
Cited by
105
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
17.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • Nature
  • Division of Mathematical Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Keywords
conceptions of learning, cram schools, student perceptions, memorization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review