The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cram School Students’ Conceptions of Learning and Learning Science in Taiwan
Abstract
The cram school in Taiwan offers additional after‐school instruction to enhance students’ academic performance, and it provides a unique educational context to investigate students’ perspectives toward learning. The purpose of this study was to explore 45 cram school students’ (around 14 years old) conceptions of learning and learning science. The research data were gathered from interviews with each of the students, and the interview responses were further analyzed by a phenomenographic method. It was found that most of these students conceptualized learning or learning science as memorizing school knowledge, preparing for tests, or practicing tutorial problems and processing calculations. This study also revealed that about 76% of the students expressed coherent views between conceptions of learning in general, and those of learning science in particular. Further analyses of student interview responses suggested that the students held a quantitative view of learning (science) and they tended to atomize school knowledge while learning (science). Their motivation for learning was mainly driven by external factors, such as examination scores, and they probably employed a surface approach to learning. Moreover, their conceptions of learning or learning science might imply a dualist epistemology for the nature of knowing and knowledge. This study also showed some evidence that the special educational context of cram schools might guide students develop certain conceptions of learning, thus leading to particular study and motivational approaches.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, the highly competitive examination system has led to a learning environment in which teaching and learning activities primarily focused on how to best prepare students' for college entrance tests (Tsai and Kuo 2008).”
From Science education reform in Confucian learning cultures: teachers' perspectives on policy and practice in Taiwan (2018) · cites this paper as Tsai and Kuo 2008
Citations
Cites
Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years; A Scheme
Perry, W. G. (1970) · Cited by 4,179
Phenomenography ? Describing conceptions of the world around us
Marton, F. (1981) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00132516 · Cited by 3,289
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543067001088 · Cited by 3,181
Murray, C. A., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1994) · Cited by 1,383
Mullis, I. V. S., Martín, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004) · Cited by 1,100
Dimensionality and Disciplinary Differences in Personal Epistemology
Hofer, B. K. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1026 · Cited by 984
Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993) · International Journal of Educational Research · Cited by 962
Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change
West, L. H. T., & Pines, A. L. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 910
Personal Epistemology Research: Implications for Learning and Teaching
Hofer, B. K. (2001) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1011965830686 · Cited by 851
Schommer-Aikins, M. A. (2004) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_3 · Cited by 731
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Dweck , C. S. 1999 . Self‐theories , Philadelphia : Psychology Press .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tsai, C., Ho, H. N. J., Liang, J., & Lin, H. (2011) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.002 · Cited by 207
Self-citationConceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment
Yang, Y., & Tsai, C. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.003 · Cited by 175
Self-citationTsai, C. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.019 · Cited by 112
Self-citationLiang, J., & Tsai, C. (2010) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690903397796 · Cited by 93
Self-citationKhan, M. S. H., Abdou, B. O., Kettunen, J., & Gregory, S. (2019) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244019861457 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsai, C., & Kuo, P.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
- National Pingtung University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Tsai, Chin‐Chung
- ORCID
- Tsai, Chin‐Chung
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-11-28
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 353-375
- ISSN
- 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5289
- OpenAlex
- W1994769353
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 17.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Council
- Nature
- Division of Mathematical Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Education › Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
- Keywords
- conceptions of learning, cram schools, student perceptions, memorization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
