The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promoting Systems Thinking through Biology Lessons
Abstract
This study’s goal was to analyze various teaching approaches within the context of natural science lessons, especially in biology. The main focus of the paper lies on the effectiveness of different teaching methods in promoting systems thinking in the field of Education for Sustainable Development. The following methods were incorporated into the study: special lessons designed to promote systems thinking, a computer‐simulated scenario on the topic “ecosystem forest,” and a combination of both special lessons and the computer simulation. These groups were then compared to a control group. A questionnaire was used to assess systems thinking skills of 424 sixth‐grade students of secondary schools in Germany. The assessment differentiated between a conceptual understanding (measured as achievement score) and a reflexive justification (measured as justification score) of systems thinking. The following control variables were used: logical thinking, grades in school, memory span, and motivational goal orientation. Based on the pretest–posttest control group design, only those students who received both special instruction and worked with the computer simulation showed a significant increase in their achievement scores. The justification score increased in the computer simulation condition as well as in the combination of computer simulation and lesson condition. The possibilities and limits of promoting various forms of systems thinking by using realistic computer simulations are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory
Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2000) · System Dynamics Review · doi:10.1002/sdr.198 · Cited by 763
Cited by
The learning effects of computer simulations in science education
Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017 · Cited by 985
Peretz, R. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15121685 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Riess, W., & Mischo, C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-06-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 705-725
- ISSN
- 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5289
- OpenAlex
- W2113590202
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Promoting Systems Thinking through Biology Lessons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09500690902769946
- The paper
- Riess, W., & Mischo, C. (2010). Promoting Systems Thinking through Biology Lessons. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902769946
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.