The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Students’ Motivation and Self‐Regulation in Science Learning
Abstract
Students’ motivational beliefs and self‐regulatory practices have been identified as instrumental in influencing the engagement of students in the learning process. An important aim of science education is to empower students by nurturing the belief that they can succeed in science learning and to cultivate the adaptive learning strategies required to help to bring about that success. This article reports the development and validation of an instrument to measure salient factors related to the motivation and self‐regulation of students in lower secondary science classrooms. The development of the instrument involved identifying key determinants of students’ motivation and self‐regulation in science learning based on theoretical and research underpinnings. Once the instrument was developed, a pilot study involving 52 students from two Grade 8 science classes was undertaken. Quantitative data were collected from 1,360 students in 78 classes across Grades 8, 9, and 10, in addition to in‐depth qualitative information gathered from 10 experienced science teachers and 12 Grade 8 students. Analyses of the data suggest that the survey has strong construct validity when used with lower secondary students. This survey could be practically valuable as a tool for gathering information that may guide classroom teachers in refocusing their teaching practices and help to evaluate the effectiveness of intervention programmes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The application of electronic computers to factor analysis
Kaiser, H. F. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000116 · Cited by 12,459
Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 · Cited by 10,197 · cited 1×
“Three components of motivation that have been consistently associated to students’ adaptive motivational beliefs are learning goal orientation, task value, and self-efficacy, each of which is integral to successful engagement in self-regulated learning (Zimmerman, 2002).”
BackgroundMotivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 · Cited by 8,332
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.
Ames, C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 · Cited by 6,468
The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning
Pintrich, P. R. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3 · Cited by 5,173
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831207312909 · Cited by 3,735
Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024 · Cited by 3,646
Welch (1986) · doi:10.1002/(issn)1098-2736 · Cited by 1,666
Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038002437 · Cited by 1,315
Cited by
Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2014.881626 · Cited by 745
the National Dong Hwa University, H., Chiang, C. L., Lee, H., & the National Dong Hwa University, H. (2016) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.779 · Cited by 382
An Assessment Instrument of Technological Literacies in Makerspaces and FabLabs
Blikstein, P., Kabayadondo, Z., Martin, A., & Fields, D. (2017) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20156 · Cited by 119
Lonergan, R., Cumming, T. M., & O'Neill, S. C. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101945 · Cited by 41
Rijken, P. E., & Fraser, B. J. (2024) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-023-09477-7 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-03-18
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2159-2179
- ISSN
- 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5289
- OpenAlex
- W2164408438
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Students’ Motivation and Self‐Regulation in Science Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09500693.2010.541529
- The paper
- Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2011). Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Students’ Motivation and Self‐Regulation in Science Learning. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.541529
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.