Information literacy in science writing: how students find, identify, and use scientific literature
Abstract
For undergraduate students to achieve science literacy, they must first develop information literacy skils. These skills align with Information Literacy Standards and include determining appropriate databases, distinguishing among resource types, and citing resources ethically. To effectively improve information literacy and science literacy, we must identify how students interact with authentic scientific texts. In this case study, we addressed this aim by embedding a science librarian into a science writing course, where students wrote a literature review on a research topic of their choice. Library instruction was further integrated through the use of an online guide and outside assistance. To evaluate the evolution of information literacy in our students and provide evidence of student practices, we used task-scaffolded writing assessments, a reflection, and surveys. We found that students improved their ability and confidence in finding research articles using discipline-specific databases as well as their ability to distinguish primary from secondary research articles. We also identified ways students improperly used and cited resources in their writing assignments. While our results reveal a better understanding of how students find and approach scientific research articles, additional research is needed to develop effective strategies to improve long-term information literacy in the sciences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The review does not include any approaches designed to guide students on searching, finding, and using PSL.
“We also do not include any approaches that are designed to guide students on searching, finding, and using PSL (e.g., Klucevsek and Brungard, 2016).”
From Reading Primary Scientific Literature: Approaches for Teaching Students in the Undergraduate STEM Classroom (2023) · cites this paper as Klucevsek and Brungard, 2016
Cites
Teaching the process of science: faculty perceptions and an effective methodology
Coil, D., Wenderoth, M. P., Cunningham, M., & Dirks, C. (2010) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Scientific writing of novice researchers: What difficulties and encouragements do they encounter?
Shah, J., Shah, A., & Pietrobon, R. (2009) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31819a8c3c · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Using Primary Literature to Teach Science Literacy to Introductory Biology Students
Krontiris-Litowitz, J. (2013) · Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v14i1.538 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Goudsouzian, L. K., & Hsu, J. L. (2023) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.22-10-0211 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Klucevsek, K. M., & Brungard, A. B.
- Affiliations
- Duquesne University (US)
- Slippery Rock University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Klucevsek, Kristin M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-11-18
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2573-2595
- ISSN
- 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5289
- OpenAlex
- W2554969572
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 37.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- information literacy, scientific literacy, scientific writing, library instruction, science librarians, undergraduate students, research databases, primary and secondary sources, citation practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review