Cited by 37Library Science and Information LiteracyScience Education and PedagogyEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Information literacy in science writing: how students find, identify, and use scientific literature

Klucevsek, Kristin M., Brungard, Allison B.·2016·International Journal of Science Education

Abstract

For undergraduate students to achieve science literacy, they must first develop information literacy skils. These skills align with Information Literacy Standards and include determining appropriate databases, distinguishing among resource types, and citing resources ethically. To effectively improve information literacy and science literacy, we must identify how students interact with authentic scientific texts. In this case study, we addressed this aim by embedding a science librarian into a science writing course, where students wrote a literature review on a research topic of their choice. Library instruction was further integrated through the use of an online guide and outside assistance. To evaluate the evolution of information literacy in our students and provide evidence of student practices, we used task-scaffolded writing assessments, a reflection, and surveys. We found that students improved their ability and confidence in finding research articles using discipline-specific databases as well as their ability to distinguish primary from secondary research articles. We also identified ways students improperly used and cited resources in their writing assignments. While our results reveal a better understanding of how students find and approach scientific research articles, additional research is needed to develop effective strategies to improve long-term information literacy in the sciences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09500693.2016.1253120

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klucevsek, K. M., & Brungard, A. B.
Affiliations
  • Duquesne University (US)
  • Slippery Rock University (US)
Corresponding author
Klucevsek, Kristin M.
Venue
International Journal of Science Education
Published
2016-11-18
Volume
38
Issue
17
Pages
2573-2595
ISSN
  • 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5289
OpenAlex
W2554969572
Cited by
37
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
37.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
information literacy, scientific literacy, scientific writing, library instruction, science librarians, undergraduate students, research databases, primary and secondary sources, citation practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review