Cited by 305Political Economy and MarxismExtractivism and Socioeconomic IssuesMining and Resource Management

On the multiple frontiers of extraction: excavating contemporary capitalism

Mezzadra, Sandro, Neilson, Brett·2017·Cultural Studies

Abstract

Understanding the intensification and expansion of extractive industries in contemporary capitalism requires an approach attentive not only to the literal forms of extraction prevalent in mining and agribusiness but also to new fronts of extraction emerging in activities such as data mining and biocapitalism. This article introduces the concept of operations of capital to trace connections between the expansive logic of extraction and capitalist activity in the domains of logistics and finance. Arguing that extractive operations are at large across these domains, we explore their relevance for capital’s relation with its multiple outsides. The resulting analysis provides a basis for mapping struggles against the changing forms of dispossession and exploitation enabled by extraction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09502386.2017.1303425

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data appropriation is a form of fundamental appropriation of resource or extraction.

    “More helpful are approaches which see what is going on with data as a form of fundamental appropriation of resource (Greene and Joseph 2015;Thatcher et al. 2016, drawing on Harvey 2004) or extraction (Mezzadra and Neilson 2017).”

    From Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject (2019) · cites this paper as Mezzadra and Neilson 2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mezzadra, S., & Neilson, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Mezzadra, Sandro
Venue
Cultural Studies
Published
2017-03-17
Volume
31
Issue
2-3
Pages
185-204
ISSN
  • 0950-2386 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4348
OpenAlex
W2596546088
Cited by
305
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3
FWCI
48.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cultural Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP130103720)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
Keywords
extraction, contemporary capitalism, data mining, biocapitalism, mining, agribusiness, logistics, dispossession, exploitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review