Cited by 41Ethics and Social Impacts of AIFace recognition and analysisBiometric Identification and Security

Seeing infrastructure: race, facial recognition and the politics of data

Stevens, Nikki, Keyes, Os·2021·Cultural Studies

Abstract

Facial recognition technology (FRT) has been widely studied and criticized for its racialising impacts and its role in the overpolicing of minoritised communities. However, a key aspect of facial recognition technologies is the dataset of faces used for training and testing. In this article, we situate FRT as an infrastructural assemblage and focus on the history of four facial recognition datasets: the original dataset created by W.W. Bledsoe and his team at the Panoramic Research Institute in 1963; the FERET dataset collected by the Army Research Laboratory in 1995; MEDS-I (2009) and MEDS-II (2011), the datasets containing dead arrestees, curated by the MITRE Corporation; and the Diversity in Faces dataset, created in 2019 by IBM. Through these four exemplary datasets, we suggest that the politics of race in facial recognition are about far more than simply representation, raising questions about the potential side-effects and limitations of efforts to simply ‘de-bias’ data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09502386.2021.1895252

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Ballantyne M., 1996, Ai magazine, 17, 7
  2. Buolamwini J., 2018, Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, 81, 1
  3. Jones S.R., 2000, Journal of college student development, 41, 405
  4. Stark L., 2018, First Monday, 23, 9
  5. Tagg J., 1993, The burden of representation: essays on photographies and histories. vol. 80
  6. Wittkower D.E., 2016, First Monday, 21

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevens, N., & Keyes, O.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Keyes, Os
Venue
Cultural Studies
Published
2021-03-26
Volume
35
Issue
4-5
Pages
833-853
ISSN
  • 0950-2386 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4348
OpenAlex
W3139791597
Cited by
41
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
8.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cultural Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ada Lovelace Fellowship
  • Microsoft Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
facial recognition technology, race, racial bias, data politics, FERET dataset, minoritized communities, history of biometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review