The moral behavior of ethics professors: Relationships among self-reported behavior, expressed normative attitude, and directly observed behavior
Abstract
Do philosophy professors specializing in ethics behave, on average, any morally better than do other professors? If not, do they at least behave more consistently with their expressed values? These questions have never been systematically studied. We examine the self-reported moral attitudes and moral behavior of 198 ethics professors, 208 non-ethicist philosophers, and 167 professors in departments other than philosophy on eight moral issues: academic society membership, voting, staying in touch with one's mother, vegetarianism, organ and blood donation, responsiveness to student emails, charitable giving, and honesty in responding to survey questionnaires. On some issues, we also had direct behavioral measures that we could compare with the self-reports. Ethicists expressed somewhat more stringent normative attitudes on some issues, such as vegetarianism and charitable donation. However, on no issue did ethicists show unequivocally better behavior than the two comparison groups. Our findings on attitude-behavior consistency were mixed: ethicists showed the strongest relationship between behavior and expressed moral attitude regarding voting but the weakest regarding charitable donation. We discuss implications for several models of the relationship between philosophical reflection and real-world moral behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048 · see citing works
Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant, I., & Korsgaard, C. M. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809590.004 · Cited by 3,731 · see citing works
Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy
Williams, B. (2006) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203969847 · Cited by 2,723 · see citing works
Warnock, M., & Journal, I. P. (1990) · Irish Philosophical Journal · doi:10.5840/irishphil199071/21 · Cited by 2,602 · see citing works
The psychology of moral development
Kohlberg, L. (1984) · Cited by 1,806 · see citing works
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
Singer, P. (2018) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.67 · Cited by 1,658 · see citing works
Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy
Downie, R. S. (1986) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.12.3.165 · Cited by 1,573 · see citing works
The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment
Cushman, F. A., Young, L., & HAUSER, M. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
The Role of Constructs in Psychological and Educational Measurement
(2001) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410607454 · Cited by 875 · see citing works
(2002) · Cited by 771 · see citing works
Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: Tests using the item count technique
Holbrook, A. L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2010) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfp065 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul
(2007) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7504.003.0004 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Bartels, D. M., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Mikhail, J. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511780578 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Confucian Moral Self Cultivation
Garner, R., & Ivanhoe, P. J. (1999) · Philosophy East and West · doi:10.2307/1399957 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. A. (2012) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01438.x · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Self-citationWilson, T. D., Dunn, D. S., Kraft, D., & Lisle, D. J. (1989) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60311-1 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory
Posner, R. A. (1998) · Harvard Law Review · doi:10.2307/1342477 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
The problematics of moral and legal theory
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0861 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Confucian moral self cultivation
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-0852 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
What do vegetarians in the United States eat?
Haddad, E. H., & Tanzman, J. S. (2003) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/78.3.626s · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Gender and Philosophical Intuition*
Buckwalter, W., & Stich, S. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199927418.003.0013 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Do ethicists steal more books?
Schwitzgebel, E. (2009) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515080903409952 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Case for Nietzschean Moral Psychology
Knobe, J., & Leiter, B. (2007) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199285938.003.0005 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Mill, J. S. (2003) · doi:10.1002/9780470776018.ch3 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
The Moral Behaviour of Ethicists: Peer Opinion
Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2009) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/fzp108 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationDo Ethicists and Political Philosophers Vote More Often Than Other Professors?
Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2009) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-009-0011-6 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationEthicists’ courtesy at philosophy conferences
Schwitzgebel, E., Rust, J., Huang, L. T.-L., et al. (2011) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2011.580524 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationRust, J., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2013) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12033 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationARE ETHICISTS ANY MORE LIKELY TO PAY THEIR REGISTRATION FEES AT PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS?
Schwitzgebel, E. (2013) · Economics and Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0266267113000308 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationFabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., & MacDonald, T. K. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377798.003.0009 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Baier A, 1985, Postures of the mind
- Greene JD, 2007, Moral psychology, 3, 35
- Groves, RM. Dillman, D. A., Eltinge, J. L. & Little, R.J.A. (Eds.). (2002).Survey nonresponse.New York, NY: John Wiley
- Hadot P, 1995, Philosophy as a way of life
- Moeller H, 2009, The moral fool
- Oklahoma State University, 2010, 2009–2010 Faculty salary survey by discipline
- Rosenthal R, 2008, Essentials of behavioral research
- Singer P, 2002, Animal liberation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beyond sacrificial harm: a two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology
Kahane, G., Everett, J. A. C., Earp, B. D., Caviola, L., Faber, N. S., Crockett, M. J., & Savulescu, J. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000093 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J.
- Corresponding author
- Schwitzgebel, Eric
- Venue
- Philosophical Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-01-22
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 293-327
- ISSN
- 0951-5089 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-394X
- OpenAlex
- W2038723618
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 48.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- moral behavior, attitude-behavior consistency, normative attitudes, self-reported behavior, direct observation, philosophers, vegetarian diet, organ donation, blood donation, voting, charitable giving, honesty, academic society membership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
