The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology
Abstract
The article imagines a materially informed post-qualitative research. Focusing upon issues of language and representation, under the influence of Deleuze’s Logic of Sense, it argues for research practices capable of engaging the materiality of language itself. It proposes the development of non- or post-representational research practices, drawing on contemporary materialist work that rejects the static, hierarchical logic of representation, and practices such as interpretation and analysis as conventionally understood. The article explores the ontological and the practical implications of this state of affairs, via a re-reading of a fragment of what would have been called data. Offering relief from the ressentiment and piety that have characterised qualitative methodologists’ engagements with scientific method, the ‘post’ could therefore be read as signalling the demise of qualitative research. Or at least, as inaugurating a qualitative research that would be unrepresentable to itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning
Barad, K. (2006) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv12101zq · Cited by 10,472
Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor‐network‐theory
Turnbull, J. (2008) · New Zealand Geographer · doi:10.1111/j.1745-7939.2008.00151_4.x · Cited by 7,617
(2007) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 7,214
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1461 · Cited by 6,721
Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation
Massumi, B. (2002) · doi:10.1215/9780822383574 · Cited by 4,627
Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1946 · Cited by 3,771
Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic
(1989) · Psychiatric Bulletin · doi:10.1192/pb.13.12.698-a · Cited by 3,365
The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science
Pickering, A. (1995) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001 · Cited by 2,699
Guattari, F., & Deleuze, G. (1980) · Cited by 2,657
The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science
Pickering, A. (1995) · doi:10.7208/9780226668253 · Cited by 1,603
Cited by
Peace education research in the twenty-first century: three concepts facing crisis or opportunity?
Cremin, H. (2016) · Journal of Peace Education · doi:10.1080/17400201.2015.1069736 · Cited by 107
Constantino, C. D., Manning, W. H., & Nordstrom, S. N. (2017) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.06.001 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- MacLure, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 658-667
- ISSN
- 0951-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5898
- OpenAlex
- W2085317071
- Cited by
- 849
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 476.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
- The paper
- MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.