The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation
Abstract
Although the body has been the focus of much contemporary cultural theory, the models that are typically applied neglect the most salient characteristics of embodied existence—movement, affect, and sensation—in favor of concepts derived from linguistic theory. In Parables for the Virtual Brian Massumi views the body and media such as television, film, and the Internet, as cultural formations that operate on multiple registers of sensation beyond the reach of the reading techniques founded on the standard rhetorical and semiotic models. Renewing and assessing William James’s radical empiricism and Henri Bergson’s philosophy of perception through the filter of the post-war French philosophy of Deleuze, Guattari, and Foucault, Massumi links a cultural logic of variation to questions of movement, affect, and sensation. If such concepts are as fundamental as signs and significations, he argues, then a new set of theoretical issues appear, and with them potential new paths for the wedding of scientific and cultural theory. Replacing the traditional opposition of literal and figural with new distinctions between stasis and motion and between actual and virtual, Parables for the Virtual tackles related theoretical issues by applying them to cultural mediums as diverse as architecture, body art, the digital art of Stelarc, and Ronald Reagan’s acting career. The result is an intriguing combination of cultural theory, science, and philosophy that asserts itself in a crystalline and multi-faceted argument. Parables for the Virtual will interest students and scholars of continental and Anglo-American philosophy, cultural studies, cognitive science, electronic art, digital culture, and chaos theory, as well as those concerned with the “science wars” and the relation between the humanities and the sciences in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect
Thrift, N. (2004) · Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography · doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x · Cited by 1,919
The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web
Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812472322 · Cited by 871
Collective Feelings: Or, the Impressions Left by Others
Ahmed, S. (2004) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276404042133 · Cited by 864
Methodological Immaturity in Childhood Research?: Thinking through `participatory methods'
Gallacher, L.-A., & Gallagher, M. (2008) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568208091672 · Cited by 685
Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt
Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161212474472 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 40-1946-40-1946
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W588746662
- Cited by
- 3,771
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.40-1946
- The paper
- Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation. (2002). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-1946
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.