The importance of course design, feedback, and facilitation: student perceptions of the relationship between teaching presence and cognitive presence
Abstract
The Community of Inquiry framework has become a useful instrument for exploring learning in online classes; however, the interactions between the constructs of teaching presence and cognitive presence remain relatively unexplored. This study investigated student perceptions of cognitive presence as explained by three teaching presence elements; instructional design and course organization, direct instruction, and facilitated discourse, in both online and face-to-face classes. Results indicate that student perceptions of cognitive presence and teaching presence do not differ between face-to-face and online classes and that discourse facilitation is a key to engendering critical thinking or cognitive presence. Qualitative data indicated certain aspects of teaching presence that students felt related to critical thinking. Students felt critical thinking was positively influenced when an instructor designed an organized course with clear goals and relevant assignments, provided direct feedback that was encouraging, timely, and specific, and actively facilitated discussions that kept everyone focused and participating at a meaningful level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teacher feedback directly relates to student motivation.
“This is in line with research where it is shown teacher feedback directly relates to student motivation (Hosler & Arend, 2012)”
From Impact of COVID-19 Lockdowns on Australian Primary and Secondary School Students' Online Learning Experiences (2021) · cites this paper as Hosler & Arend, 2012
Cites
Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6 · Cited by 6,619 · see citing works
ASSESSING TEACHING PRESENCE IN A COMPUTER CONFERENCING CONTEXT
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875 · Cited by 1,885 · see citing works
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Martin, F., Wu, T., Wan, L., & Xie, K. (2022) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v26i1.2604 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Evaluating peer learning and assessment in online collaborative learning environments
Altınay, Z. (2017) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1232752 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Maher, D. (2021) · Social Education Research · doi:10.37256/ser.2220211062 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hosler, K. A., & Arend, B. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Northern Colorado (US)
- University of Denver (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hosler, Kim A.
- Venue
- Educational Media International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-229
- ISSN
- 0952-3987 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5790
- OpenAlex
- W1963935972
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 20.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Media International (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Keywords
- community of inquiry, teaching presence, cognitive presence, course design, instructional design, course organization, direct instruction, instructor feedback, student perceptions, online learning, face-to-face learning, critical thinking, online discussion facilitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review