Cited by 110Online and Blended LearningVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesCommunication in Education and Healthcare

The importance of course design, feedback, and facilitation: student perceptions of the relationship between teaching presence and cognitive presence

Hosler, Kim A., Arend, Bridget D.·2012·Educational Media International

Abstract

The Community of Inquiry framework has become a useful instrument for exploring learning in online classes; however, the interactions between the constructs of teaching presence and cognitive presence remain relatively unexplored. This study investigated student perceptions of cognitive presence as explained by three teaching presence elements; instructional design and course organization, direct instruction, and facilitated discourse, in both online and face-to-face classes. Results indicate that student perceptions of cognitive presence and teaching presence do not differ between face-to-face and online classes and that discourse facilitation is a key to engendering critical thinking or cognitive presence. Qualitative data indicated certain aspects of teaching presence that students felt related to critical thinking. Students felt critical thinking was positively influenced when an instructor designed an organized course with clear goals and relevant assignments, provided direct feedback that was encouraging, timely, and specific, and actively facilitated discussions that kept everyone focused and participating at a meaningful level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09523987.2012.738014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hosler, K. A., & Arend, B. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Northern Colorado (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Hosler, Kim A.
Venue
Educational Media International
Published
2012-09
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
217-229
ISSN
  • 0952-3987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5790
OpenAlex
W1963935972
Cited by
110
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
20.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Media International (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
community of inquiry, teaching presence, cognitive presence, course design, instructional design, course organization, direct instruction, instructor feedback, student perceptions, online learning, face-to-face learning, critical thinking, online discussion facilitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review