The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gustav Metzger’s Auto‐Destructive/Auto‐Creative Art: An Art of Manifesto, 1959–1969
Abstract
Throughout the last sixty years, since he first enrolled in David Bomberg’s painting and composition class at the Borough Polytechnic in London in 1946, Gustav Metzger has followed a course that ha...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which as Andrew Wilson has noted, became a critical platform to contextualise and test his theories in front of audiences (Wilson 2008, 187).”
From Gustav Metzger: Iconoclasm and Interdisciplinarity (2017) · cites this paper as Wilson 2008, 187
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gustav Metzger: Iconoclasm and Interdisciplinarity
Fisher, E. (2017) · Taylor & Francis · doi:10.17863/cam.9889 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, A.
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Andrew
- ORCID
- Wilson, Andrew
- Venue
- Third Text
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-194
- ISSN
- 0952-8822 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-5297
- OpenAlex
- W1561340734
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 15.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Third Text (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Politics, and Modernism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Visual Culture and Art Theory
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Contemporary art, education, critique
- Keywords
- Gustav Metzger, art education, avant-garde painting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
