The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS
Abstract
This article provides an overview of how generalised multi-regional input–output models can be used for carbon footprint applications. We focus on the relevance and suitability of such evidence to inform decision making. Such an overview is currently missing. Drawing on UK results, we cover carbon footprint applications in seven areas: national emissions inventories and trade, emission drivers, economic sectors, supply chains, organisations, household consumption and lifestyles as well as sub-national emission inventories. The article highlights the multiple uses of generalised multi-regional input–output models for carbon footprinting and concludes by highlighting important avenues for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., Jolliet, O., Klann, U., Krewitt, W., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0263745 · Cited by 1,025
Self-citationCauses of Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon
Margulis, S. (2003) · World Bank Working Papers · doi:10.1596/0-8213-5691-7 · Cited by 349
Cited by
Interrogating the circular economy: The moral economy of resource recovery in the EU
Gregson, N., Crang, M., Fuller, S., & Holmes, H. (2015) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2015.1013353 · Cited by 743
Carbon Emissions of Infrastructure Development
Müller, D. B., Liu, G., Løvik, A. N., Modaresi, R., Pauliuk, S., Steinhoff, F. S., & Brattebø, H. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es402618m · Cited by 445
Socioeconomic impact assessment of China's CO2 emissions peak prior to 2030
Mi, Z., Wei, Y.-M., Wang, B., Meng, J., Liu, Z., Shan, Y., Liu, J., & Guan, D. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.055 · Cited by 423
Self-citationConsumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study
Barrett, J., Peters, G., Wiedmann, T., Scott, K., Lenzen, M., Roelich, K., & Le Quéré, C. (2013) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2013.788858 · Cited by 337
Self-citationDecarbonizing urban transport in European cities: four cases show possibly high co-benefits
Creutzig, F., Mühlhoff, R., & Römer, J. (2012) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044042 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Minx, J. C., Wiedmann, T., Wood, R., Peters, G. P., Lenzen, M., Owen, A., Scott, K., Barrett, J., Hubacek, K., Baiocchi, G., Paul, A., Dawkins, E., Briggs, J., Guan, D., Suh, S., & Ackerman, F.
- Venue
- Economic Systems Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 187-216
- ISSN
- 0953-5314 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5758
- OpenAlex
- W2153118634
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09535310903541298
- The paper
- Minx, J. C., Wiedmann, T., Wood, R., Peters, G. P., Lenzen, M., Owen, A., Scott, K., Barrett, J., Hubacek, K., Baiocchi, G., Paul, A., Dawkins, E., Briggs, J., Guan, D., Suh, S., & Ackerman, F. (2009). INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS. Economic Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310903541298
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
