Cited by 143Urban Transport and Accessibilitytransportation and logistics systemsTransportation Planning and Optimization

Decarbonizing urban transport in European cities: four cases show possibly high co-benefits

Open access
Creutzig, Felix, Mühlhoff, Rainer, Römer, Julia·2012·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

Cities worldwide are increasingly becoming agents of climate change mitigation, while simultaneously aiming for other goals, such as improved accessibility and clean air.Based on stakeholder interviews and data analysis, we assess the current state of urban mobility in the four European cities of Barcelona, Malmö, Sofia and Freiburg.We then provide scenarios of increasingly ambitious policy packages, reducing greenhouse gas emissions from urban transport by up to 80% from 2010 to 2040.We find significant concurrent co-benefits in cleaner air, reduced noise ambience, fewer traffic-related injuries and deaths, more physical activity, less congestion and monetary fuel savings.Our scenarios suggest that non-motorized transport, especially bicycles, can occupy high modal shares, particularly in cities with less than 0.5 million inhabitants.We think that this kind of multi-criteria assessment of social costs and benefits is a useful complement to cost-benefit analysis of climate change mitigation measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044042

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In many cases, cobenefits outweigh the mitigation benefits of specific GHG emission reduction strategies.

    “In many cases, cobenefits outweigh the mitigation benefits of specific GHG emission reduction strategies.”
  • Improved outdoor air quality in cities results from reduced private motorized mobility using combustion and diesel engines and from more active mobility, often associated with the more accessible environments of compact cities.

    “it includes cobenefits from improved outdoor air quality in cities, resulting from reduced private motorized mobility using combustion and diesel engines, and from more active mobility 60,61 , often associated with the more accessible environments of compact cities 62”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Creutzig, F., Mühlhoff, R., & Römer, J.
Affiliations
  • Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (DE)
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Creutzig, Felix
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2012-12-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
044042
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130883049
Cited by
143
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
20.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DepositOnce (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
  • Technische Universität Berlin – Universitätsbibliothek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › transportation and logistics systems
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
greenhouse gas emissions reduction, co-benefits, active transport, cycling, air quality, noise pollution, road safety, physical activity, traffic congestion, fuel consumption reduction, climate change mitigation, European cities, Barcelona, Malmö, Sofia, Freiburg

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review