The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumers as Co-developers: Learning and Innovation Outside the Firm
Abstract
This study describes a process in which a firm relies on an external consumer community for innovation. While it has been recognized that users may sometimes innovate, little is known about what commercial firms can do to motivate and capture such innovations and their related benifits. We contribute to strategy literature by suggesting that learning and innovation efforts from which a firm may benifit need not necessarily be located within the organization, but may well reside in the consumer environment. We also contribute to the existing theory on ‘user-driven innovation’ by showing what firms purposively can do to generate consumer innovation efforts. An explorative case study shows that consumer innovation can be structured, motivated, and partly organized by a commercial firm that organizes the infrastructure for consumers’ interactive learning in a public online domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · cited 1×
“To understand these interactions from a learning perspective we first distinguish between lower and higher-level learning (Argyris & Schön, 1978; Kuhn, 1996; March, 1991).”
BackgroundDeci, E. L. (1975) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9 · Cited by 2,911
Informal boundary-spanning communication in the innovation process: an empirical study
Conway, S. (1995) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537329508524216 · Cited by 102
Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits
von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.7.821.2817 · cited 1×
““As users begin to apply the toolkit to their projects, the more advanced among them will ‘bump up against the edges’ of the solution space on offer and then request the additional capabilities they need to implement their novel designs” (von Hippel et al., 2002 p. 19).”
Background
Cited by
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2009) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00667.x · Cited by 908
Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development
Shah, S. K. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553 · Cited by 894
Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy
Hajli, N. (2015) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005 · Cited by 826
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2007) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20077 · Cited by 686
Boudreau, K. J. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0678 · Cited by 676
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeppesen, L. B., & Molin, M. J.
- Venue
- Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 363-383
- ISSN
- 0953-7325 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3990
- OpenAlex
- W1969338947
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 20.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumers as Co-developers: Learning and Innovation Outside the Firm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09537320310001601531
- The paper
- Jeppesen, L. B., & Molin, M. J. (2003). Consumers as Co-developers: Learning and Innovation Outside the Firm. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320310001601531
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.