The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cells
Abstract
Innovation processes are influenced by the dynamics of expectations. This paper addresses the question of what happens after a hype. It takes a closer look at the case of stationary fuel cells, for which a hype could be identified in 2001 followed by a clear downscaling of expectations and disappointment. Innovation activities, however, remained largely unaffected by the disappointment. We offer two explanations. First, only generalised expectations were adjusted after the hype, while overarching expectations (frames) remained stable and continued to legitimate the technology. Second, emerging institutional structures lead to increasing positive externalities thus stabilising ongoing innovation activities. These institutionalisation processes, again, were supported by a transformation of promises into requirements during the hype and the fact that the frames continued to legitimise the technology afterwards. We conclude with the proposition to differentiate disappointments according to which type of expectations changes after the hype.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources
Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R., & Coenen, L. (2012) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001 · Cited by 708
Self-citationThe hype cycle model: A review and future directions
Dedehayir, O., & Steinert, M. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.005 · Cited by 425
Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy – A framework and a case study on biogas technology
Markard, J., Wirth, S., & Truffer, B. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.009 · Cited by 313
Self-citationDoes hype create irreversibilities? Affective circulation and market investments in digital health
Geiger, S., & Gross, N. (2017) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593117692024 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruef, A., & Markard, J.
- Venue
- Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-338
- ISSN
- 0953-7325 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3990
- OpenAlex
- W2089110760
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09537321003647354
- The paper
- Ruef, A., & Markard, J. (2010). What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537321003647354
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.