Cited by 172Organic Food and AgricultureConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingEconomic and Environmental Valuation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 167 of the 213 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The willingness to consume organic food: A review

Open access

Abstract

Giving the rising interest in naturally grown foods; several studies have contrasted various features of organic and conventionally grown foods in relation to consumer attitudes, perceptions, and preference for organic foods. This paper aims to explore consumers’ willingness to consume organic foods; the extent and attributes of consumer knowledge and awareness about organic food as well as consumer attitudes and preferences for organically grown foods. Articles from different peer review journals were used to develop this paper. The findings of this paper show that human health, food safety, attitudes and perceptions and willingness to pay for a price premium are some of the factors influencing consumers’ willingness to consume organic foods. Therefore, there is a need to create more awareness in the food industry relating to the health benefits of consuming organic foods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540105.2021.1874885

Cites

167 of 167 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 213 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.22004/ag.econ.30960 · DOI
  2. Benbrook, C., Zhao, X., Yáñez, J., Davies, N., & Andrews, P. (2008). New evidence confirms the nutritional superiority of plant-based organic foods. In 136st APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition Conference. San Diego, California, 421–431
  3. Bephage, G. (2000). Social and behavioral sciences for nurses, an integrated approach. Churchill Livingstone Press.
  4. Bonti-Ankomah, S., & Yiridoe, E. K. (2006). Organic and conventional food: A literature review of the economics of consumer perceptions and preferences. Organic Agriculture Centre of Canada, 59, 1–40.
  5. Bordeleau, G., Myers-Smith, I., Midak, M., & Szeremeta, A. (2002). Food quality: A comparison of organic and conventional fruits and vegetables. Kongelige Veterinoer-og Landbohøjskole.
  6. Corfe, S. (2018). What are the barriers to eating healthily in the UK? Social Market Foundation.
  7. Crinnion, W. J. (2010). Organic foods contain higher levels of certain nutrients, lower levels of pesticides, and may provide health benefits for the consumer. Alternative Medicine Review, 15(1), 4–12.
  8. Davis, J. G., & Kendal, P. (2005). Preventing E. coli from garden to plate. Food Safety, 9(369), 1–4.
  9. Demeritt, L. (2002). All things organic 2002: A look at the organic consumer. The Hartman Group.
  10. 10.1016/j.njas.2015.05.001 · DOI
  11. Dipeolu, A. O., Philip, B. B., Aiyelaagbe, I. O. O., Akinbode, S. O., & Adedokun, T. A. (2009). Consumer awareness and willingness to pay for organic vegetables in SW Nigeria. Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry, 10(11), 57–65.
  12. Domagała-Świątkiewicz, I., & Gąstoł, M. (2012). Comparative study on mineral content of organic and conventional carrot, celery and red beet juices. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 11(2), 173–183.
  13. Frison, E. A. (2016). From uniformity to diversity: A paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agro-ecological systems. In International panel of experts on sustainable food systems (IPES) (pp. 96).
  14. Gastoł, M., & Domagała-Świątkiewicz, I. (2012). Comparative study on mineral content of organic and conventional apple, pear and black currant juices. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 11(3), 3–14.
  15. Ham, M., Pap, A., & Štimac, H. (2015). Eco-food production and market perspectives in Croatia. Business Logistics in Modern Management, 15, 93–109.
  16. Hornick S. B. (2010). Nutritional quality of crops as affected by management practices. Agricultural Research Service US Department of Agriculture (pp. 1–8). Beltsville USA.
  17. 10.1108/00070709710193998 · DOI
  18. Leong, G. Y., & Ng, Y. L.. (2014). Dissertation. Malaysia: University of Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR) http://eprints.utar.edu.my/1346/1/Consumption_of_Organic_Product.pdf
  19. Lo, M., & Matthews, D. (2002). Results of routine testing of organic food for agro-chemical residues. Proceedings of the UK organic research 2002 Conference (pp. 26-28 March 2002.61–64). Organic Centre Wales, Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales Aberystwyth.
  20. MacEachern, D. (1990). Save our planet–750 everyday ways you can help clean up the Earth. Dell Publishing Group.
  21. Magnusson M.. (2004). Consumer perception of organic and genetically modified foods: Health and environmental considerations (Doctoral dissertation) Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis Sweden. urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-4218
  22. Niggli U. Slabe A. Schmid O. Halberg N. & Schlüter M. (2008). Vision for an organic food and farming research agenda 2025. Organic Knowledge for the Future (pp. 1–45). Retrieved May 22 2020 from https://orgprints.org/13439/1/niggli-etal-2008-technology-platform-organics.pdf.
  23. O’Neal, P. W. (2007). Motivation of health behavior. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
  24. Øystein S. Persillet V. & Sylvander B. (2001). The consumers’ faithfulness and competence in regard to organic products: Comparison between France and Norway. Paper presented at the 2002 IFOAM Conference Vancouver Canada.
  25. The Packer. (2001). Fresh trends 2001: Understanding consumers and produce. Produce Marketing Association Fresh Summit 2000 Workshop Summary. Retrieved May 20 2020 from http://www.pma.com
  26. Raza S. A. Shah N. & Nisar W. (2019). Consumer buying behavior of organic food with respect to health and safety concerns among adolescents (pp. 1–27). Retrieved May 23 2020 from https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/93570
  27. Sithole, P. G. (2018). Master thesis. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/103514
  28. Srivastava, A. K., & Hu, C. (2019). Fruit crops: Diagnosis and management of nutrient constraints. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  29. 10.18461/1869-6945-14 · DOI
  30. Torres, C., & Rampa, F. (2017 September/October). Sustainable food systems matter-diversification for sustainable food systems and the role of European centre for development policy management. Great Insights Magazine, 6(4), 16–17. Retrieved November 19, 2020 from https://ecdpm.org/great-insights/sustainable-food-systems/diversification-sustainable-f
  31. Tran, A. H. (2017). Factors of consumers’ acceptance of organic food. Actual Problems in Economics, 189, 150.
  32. 10.22004/ag.econ.103989 · DOI
  33. Wang, Q., Halbrendt, C., & Webb, S. (1997). Consumer demand for organic food in China: Evidence from survey data. In W. Lockertz (Ed.), Agricultural production and nutrition, conference proceedings (pp. 187–194). Tufts University.
  34. Willer H. & Lernoud J. (2016). Research institute of organic agriculture FiBL and IFOAM organics international. The World of Organic Agriculture Statistics and Emerging Trends (pp. 1–336).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–138 of 138

Metadata

Authors
Eyinade, G. A., Mushunje, A., & Yusuf, S. F. G.
Affiliations
University of Fort Hare (ZA)
Corresponding author
Eyinade, Gabriel Adewunmi
Venue
Food and Agricultural Immunology
Published
2021-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
78-104
ISSN
  • 0954-0105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3443
OpenAlex
W3125741348
Cited by
172
References
213
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 4
FWCI
16.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food and Agricultural Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
organic food, willingness to pay, consumer attitudes, consumer preferences, consumer knowledge, consumer awareness, food safety, health benefits, price premium, organic vs conventional food

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review