Cited by 4,321Behavioral Health and InterventionsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Nature and Operation of Attitudes

Ajzen, Icek·2001·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

▪ Abstract This survey of attitude theory and research published between 1996 and 1999 covers the conceptualization of attitude, attitude formation and activation, attitude structure and function, and the attitude-behavior relation. Research regarding the expectancy-value model of attitude is considered, as are the roles of accessible beliefs and affective versus cognitive processes in the formation of attitudes. The survey reviews research on attitude strength and its antecedents and consequences, and covers progress made on the assessment of attitudinal ambivalence and its effects. Also considered is research on automatic attitude activation, attitude functions, and the relation of attitudes to broader values. A large number of studies dealt with the relation between attitudes and behavior. Research revealing additional moderators of this relation is reviewed, as are theory and research on the link between intentions and actions. Most work in this context was devoted to issues raised by the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. The present review highlights the nature of perceived behavioral control, the relative importance of attitudes and subjective norms, the utility of adding more predictors, and the roles of prior behavior and habit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence suggests that such orientations or attitudes can be changed.

    “Evidence also suggests that such orientations or attitudes can be changed (Ajzen, 2001).”
  • There were cases of measurement misspecification in the reviewed studies, such as using a single-item measure or a heightened enjoyment scale for attitude.

    “There were, however, cases of measurement misspecification, for example the use of a single-item measure in one study [105], or the measure of the attitude construct using a “heightened enjoyment” scale in another [101], reflecting a common misunderstanding of attitude theory [122].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ajzen, I.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Ajzen, Icek
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2001-02
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
27-58
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2134694239
Cited by
4,321
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 177 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 214 · 2023: 241 · 2022: 240 · 2021: 239 · 2020: 226 · 2019: 212 · 2018: 193 · 2017: 188 · 2016: 204 · 2015: 239 · 2014: 218 · 2013: 203 · 2012: 196
FWCI
13.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
attitude theory, attitude formation, attitude structure, attitude-behavior relationship, expectancy-value theory, attitude strength, attitudinal ambivalence, attitude functions, values, theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, perceived behavioral control, subjective norms, habit
MeSH terms
Affect, Attitude, Cognition, Humans, Psychological Theory, Social Behavior, Social Responsibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review