Cited by 135HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV/AIDS Impact and Responses

“How can I tell?” Consequences of HIV status disclosure among couples in eastern African communities in the context of an ongoing HIV “test-and-treat” trial

Open access
Maeri, Irene, El Ayadi, Alison, Getahun, Monica, Charlebois, Edwin, Akatukwasa, Cecilia, Tumwebaze, Dennis, Itiakorit, Harriet, Owino, Lawrence +12 more·2016·AIDS Care

Abstract

People living with HIV/AIDS anticipate HIV-related stigma and fear disclosure to intimate partners. Yet, disclosure is critical to reducing HIV transmission and improving care engagement. This qualitative study characterized HIV disclosure experiences and normative beliefs among couples in communities participating in an HIV test-and-treat trial in Kenya and Uganda (Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health, NCT#01864603). In-depth interviews were conducted with care providers (n = 50), leaders (n = 32) and members (n = 112) of eight communities. Data were analyzed using grounded theoretical approaches and Atlas.ti software. Findings confirmed gender differences in barriers to disclosure: while both men and women feared blame and accusation, women also feared violence and abandonment ("I did not tell my husband because [what if] I tell him and he abandons me at the last moment when I am in labor?"). Positive consequences included partner support for increased care-seeking and adherence ("My husband keeps on reminding me 'have you taken those drugs?'") Yet negative consequences included partnership dissolution, blame, and reports of violence ("some men beat their wives just because of that [bringing HIV medications home]"). Among HIV-infected individuals in discordant relationships, men more often reported supportive spouses ("we normally share [HIV-risk-reduction strategies] since I have been infected and she is HIV negative"), than did women ("my husband refused to use condoms and even threatened to marry another wife"). Care providers lent support for HIV-positive women who wanted to engage partners in testing but feared negative consequences: "They engaged the two of us in a session and asked him if we could all test." Findings demonstrate differing experiences and support needs of women and men living with HIV in eastern Africa, with HIV-positive women in discordant couples particularly vulnerable to negative consequences of disclosure. Efforts to strengthen capacity in health systems for gender-sensitive clinician- or counselor-assisted disclosure should be accelerated within test-and-treat efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540121.2016.1168917

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maeri, I., El Ayadi, A., Getahun, M., Charlebois, E., Akatukwasa, C., Tumwebaze, D., Itiakorit, H., Owino, L., Kwarisiima, D., Ssemmondo, E., Sang, N., Kabami, J., Clark, T. D., Petersen, M., Cohen, C. R., Bukusi, E. A., Kamya, M., Havlir, D., Camlin, C. S., & the SEARCH Collaboration
Affiliations
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration (UG)
  • Makerere University (UG)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Camlin, Carol S.
Venue
AIDS Care
Published
2016-06-02
Volume
28
Issue
sup3
Pages
59-66
ISSN
  • 0954-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0451
OpenAlex
W2474982830
Cited by
135
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Gilead Foundation
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  • U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)
  • Government of Uganda
  • Government of Kenya
  • World Bank Group
  • World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Keywords
HIV status disclosure, couples, test and treat, gender differences, intimate partner violence, stigma, partner support, care seeking, antiretroviral therapy adherence, community health workers, East Africa
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Interviews as Topic, Kenya, Male, Sexual Partners, Truth Disclosure, Uganda, Violence, HIV Infections, Condoms, Spouses, Qualitative Research, Black People, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review