The testing effect, collaborative learning, and retrieval-induced facilitation in a classroom setting
Abstract
Two studies were conducted to investigate aspects of the test effect in a tertiary education setting. During weekly tutorial sessions first year psychology students watched a psychobiology video (Phase 1), followed by different video-related activities (Phase 2). In the tutorial 1 week later, students took an unexpected test (Phase 3). In Phase 2 of Study 1, students completed a quiz in small groups (group quiz) or individually (individual quiz), highlighted the video transcript (re-study), or did nothing further (no-activity). Group quiz performance was superior to individual quiz in both Phase 2 and Phase 3. In Phase 3 individual quiz students performed better than no-activity students, but not better than restudy students. In exploring the individual testing effect further, Phase 2 of Study 2 included quiz (individual), restudy, and no-activity conditions. Quiz participants were presented with one (target) of two sets of questions, whereas restudy participants were presented with equivalent statements. During Phase 3, all participants answered both sets of questions (target and related). Quiz performance was superior to restudy and no-activity performance on both target and related material, supporting the retrieval-induced facilitation explanation of the testing effect. Implications of the current research for assessment practices in classroom settings are discussed, and directions for future research are indicated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
After 20 minutes, no retrieval-induced facilitation and no testing effect was observed; at longer delays both emerged robustly.
“After 20 minutes, no retrieval-induced facilitation and no testing effect was observed; at longer delays both emerged robustly (see also Cranney et al. 2009).”
From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Cranney et al. 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 80
- Authors
- Cranney, J., Ahn, M., McKinnon, R., Morris, S., & Watts, K.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Cranney, Jacquelyn
- Venue
- European Journal of Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-08-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 919-940
- ISSN
- 0954-1446 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0635
- OpenAlex
- W2000516910
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- testing effect, cooperative learning, restudy, classroom assessment, first-year psychology students, tutorial sessions, assessment practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review