Cited by 80Memory Processes and InfluencesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The testing effect, collaborative learning, and retrieval-induced facilitation in a classroom setting

Cranney, Jacquelyn, Ahn, Mihyun, McKinnon, Rachel, Morris, Sue, Watts, Kaaren·2009·European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to investigate aspects of the test effect in a tertiary education setting. During weekly tutorial sessions first year psychology students watched a psychobiology video (Phase 1), followed by different video-related activities (Phase 2). In the tutorial 1 week later, students took an unexpected test (Phase 3). In Phase 2 of Study 1, students completed a quiz in small groups (group quiz) or individually (individual quiz), highlighted the video transcript (re-study), or did nothing further (no-activity). Group quiz performance was superior to individual quiz in both Phase 2 and Phase 3. In Phase 3 individual quiz students performed better than no-activity students, but not better than restudy students. In exploring the individual testing effect further, Phase 2 of Study 2 included quiz (individual), restudy, and no-activity conditions. Quiz participants were presented with one (target) of two sets of questions, whereas restudy participants were presented with equivalent statements. During Phase 3, all participants answered both sets of questions (target and related). Quiz performance was superior to restudy and no-activity performance on both target and related material, supporting the retrieval-induced facilitation explanation of the testing effect. Implications of the current research for assessment practices in classroom settings are discussed, and directions for future research are indicated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09541440802413505

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After 20 minutes, no retrieval-induced facilitation and no testing effect was observed; at longer delays both emerged robustly.

    “After 20 minutes, no retrieval-induced facilitation and no testing effect was observed; at longer delays both emerged robustly (see also Cranney et al. 2009).”

    From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Cranney et al. 2009

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 80

Authors
Cranney, J., Ahn, M., McKinnon, R., Morris, S., & Watts, K.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Cranney, Jacquelyn
Venue
European Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Published
2009-08-10
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
919-940
ISSN
  • 0954-1446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0635
OpenAlex
W2000516910
Cited by
80
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
testing effect, cooperative learning, restudy, classroom assessment, first-year psychology students, tutorial sessions, assessment practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review