Cited by 97Dermatology and Skin DiseasesPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisAsthma and respiratory diseases

JAK/STAT inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Rodrigues, Maria Alexandra, Torres, Tiago·2020·Journal of Dermatological Treatment

Abstract

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease. Lesional skin of AD contains elevated levels of Th2, Th17, Th22 and Th1-citokines. With a growing movement toward use of targeted therapies, parallel to psoriasis, JAK inhibitors are an important focus of therapeutic research for AD. Methods: We review current evidence on the efficacy and safety of oral and topical JAK inhibitors for the treatment of AD. Results: Several JAK inhibitors are in phase II and III clinical trials as oral therapies for moderate-to-severe AD or as topical treatments for mild-to-moderate AD. Results thus far are encouraging, with the majority of the patients achieving the primary outcome of their trial as well as a favorable safety profile. Discussion: JAK inhibitors will most certainly be the first oral targeted option when topical therapy fails. With good oral bioavailability and lack of immunogenicity, they address some of the limitations of biologics. Yet to be defined is whether selective JAK 1 inhibitors or nonselective JAK inhibitors will provide the best equilibrium of efficacy versus side effects. Less clear is the position in the therapeutic ladder for topical JAK inhibitors; although, an unmeet need exists in the topical treatment of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09546634.2019.1577549

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current model does not yet capture inter-patient variability in pharmacological responses or the full chronicity of clinical AD.

    “These pharmacological responses are mechanistically consistent with the known mechanisms of these therapeutics, whereas the current model does not yet capture inter-patient variability in pharmacological responses or the full chronicity of clinical AD [46][47][48] .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodrigues, M. A., & Torres, T.
Affiliations
  • Department of Dermatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal;
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Torres, Tiago
Venue
Journal of Dermatological Treatment
Published
2019-02-18
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
33-40
ISSN
  • 0954-6634 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-1753
OpenAlex
W2913292104
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dermatological Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
atopic dermatitis, JAK inhibitors, JAK/STAT signaling, topical JAK inhibitor, oral JAK inhibitor, targeted therapy, Th2 cytokines, Th17 cytokines, JAK1 inhibitor, treatment efficacy and safety
MeSH terms
Janus Kinase Inhibitors, Administration, Oral, Administration, Topical, Clinical Trials as Topic, Dermatitis, Atopic, Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, STAT Transcription Factors, Janus Kinase 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review