The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An ‘Incomplete-repair’ Model for Survival after Fractionated and Continuous Irradiations
Abstract
An incomplete-repair (IR) model of survival after fractionated or continuous irradiation is derived from the concept of 'dose-equivalent' of incomplete repair. The model gives reasonably good predictions of the effect of interfraction interval, dose per fraction, and dose rate on cell survival in vivo and on tissue responses. This model is compared to the 'lethal, potentially lethal' (LPL) model after the latter has been generalized to an arbitrary number of fractions and to low dose-rate, continuous exposures. It is shown that the two models are equivalent, given certain constraints on the size of dose per fraction and dose rate. For example, in a particular cell line the equivalence of fractionation models breaks down if dose per fraction is well in excess of 4 Gy (the IR model employs the linear-quadratic survival model). The equivalence of low dose rate models breaks down for dose rates well in excess of 20 cGy/min. The assumptions on which the generalized LPL model is based are used to give a radiobiological interpretation to the incomplete-repair model. The larger beta/alpha ratio characteristic of late-responding normal tissues is interpreted in terms of the relatively faster fixation of potentially reparable lesions in the target cells of acutely responding tissues, on account of progression in the cell cycle. According to this interpretation the beta/alpha ratios estimated from isoeffective fractionation regimens are directly related to the parameters of clonogenic cell killing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Time-dose factors in radiotherapy: a review of the human data
Thames, H. D., Bentzen, S. M., Turesson, I., Overgaard, M., & Van den Bogaert, W. (1990) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/0167-8140(90)90149-q · Cited by 405
Self-citationConditions for the equivalence of continuous to pulsed low dose rate brachytherapy
Brenner, D. J., & Hall, E. J. (1991) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90158-z · Cited by 300
Bentzen, S. M., Dörr, W., Gahbauer, R., Howell, R. W., Joiner, M. C., Jones, B., Jones, D. T. L., van der Kogel, A. J., Wambersie, A., & Whitmore, G. (2012) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2012.10.006 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Thames, H. D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 319-339
- ISSN
- 0020-7616 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070423003
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An ‘Incomplete-repair’ Model for Survival after Fractionated and Continuous Irradiations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09553008514550461
- The paper
- Thames, H. D. (1985). An ‘Incomplete-repair’ Model for Survival after Fractionated and Continuous Irradiations. International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553008514550461
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.