The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delayed molecular responses to brain irradiation
Abstract
The chance of life-threatening complications occurring late after brain irradiation limits the efficacy of this form of cancer therapy. The molecular and cellular events that trigger radiation-induced brain damage are still unknown, but since they have the potential to serve as valuable targets for therapeutic intervention they are worth delineating. In this murine study, the effect of irradiation on the expression of molecules which are known to contribute to brain damage in other model systems was examined. Expression of genes encoding cytokines (TNF-alpha/beta, IL-1 alpha/beta, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6 and IFN-gamma), cytokine receptors (TNF-Rp55 and p75, IL-1R- p60 and p80, IFN-gamma R, and IL-6R), the cell adhesion molecule (ICAM-1), inducible nitric oxide synthetase (iNOS), anti-chymotrypsin (EB22/5.3), and the gliotic marker (GFAP) was evaluated over a 6-month period using a sensitive RNase protection assay (RPA). We had previously demonstrated that within 24 h of brain irradiation there is an acute transitory molecular response involving TNF-alpha, IL-1, ICAM-1, EB22/5.3 and GFAP. This study shows re-elevation of TNF-alpha, EB22/5.3 and GFAP mRNA levels at 2-3 months, but only TNF-alpha mRNA was overexpressed at 6 months. These time points are when neurological abnormalities are seen after higher doses. The data suggest that TNF-alpha may be involved in late brain responses to irradiation and could contribute to clinical symptoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breder, C. D., Hazuka, C., Ghayur, T., Klug, C., Huginin, M., Yasuda, K., Teng, M., & Saper, C. B. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.24.11393 · Cited by 226
Cited by
A Sense of Danger from Radiation1
McBride, W. H., Chiang, C.-S., Olson, J. L., Wang, C.-C., Hong, J.-H., Pajonk, F., Dougherty, G. J., Iwamoto, K. S., Pervan, M., & Liao, Y.-P. (2004) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr3196 · Cited by 323
Elimination of microglia improves cognitive function following cranial irradiation
Acharya, M. M., Green, K. N., Allen, B. D., Najafi, A. R., Syage, A., Minasyan, H., Le, M. T., Kawashita, T., Giedzinski, E., Parihar, V. K., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep31545 · Cited by 259
Parihar, V. K., Maroso, M., Syage, A., Allen, B. D., Angulo, M. C., Soltesz, I., & Limoli, C. L. (2018) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2018.03.009 · Cited by 127
McNerlin, C., Guan, F., Bronk, L., Lei, K., Grosshans, D., Young, D. W., Gaber, M. W., & Maletic-Savatic, M. (2022) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2022.07.007 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- CHIANG, J.-H. H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-53
- ISSN
- 0955-3002 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3095
- OpenAlex
- W2102821077
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delayed molecular responses to brain irradiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/095530097143527
- The paper
- CHIANG, J.-H. H. (1997). Delayed molecular responses to brain irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/095530097143527
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.