Cited by 6EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningCommunication in Education and Healthcare

Foreign language anxiety and cognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Gullo, Gabriele, Gentile, Ambra, Caci, Barbara, Alesi, Marianna·2025·The Language Learning Journal

Abstract

Many studies have investigated how cognitive factors (e.g. working memory and attention) and emotional-motivational factors (such as foreign language anxiety) may impact foreign language (FL) learning. Despite this progress, there is still much to be understood about the combined effect of these factors on the FL learning process. This systematic review aims to address this gap by analysing the relationship between foreign language anxiety and cognition. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search strategy identified 278 studies, of which only 13 eligible records were identified, after the screening process. The eligible studies explored the relationship between foreign language anxiety and cognitive factors, such as cognitive load, working memory, attention, and need for cognition. These studies generally indicated that foreign language anxiety (FLA) is associated with higher cognitive load, lack of attention and poorer working memory functioning. This result is fully supported by the metanalytic result (θ = – 0.28, Z = −10.20, SE = 0.027, p < 0.001). Future research should specifically examine the impact of FLA on cognitive abilities, focusing on intra-linguistic factors in native and foreign languages. Conducting rigorous experiments with robust random sampling and similar instruments will help making the results comparable and generalisable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09571736.2025.2532516

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gullo, G., Gentile, A., Caci, B., & Alesi, M.
Affiliations
University of Palermo (IT)
Corresponding author
Gentile, Ambra
Venue
The Language Learning Journal
Published
2025-08-25
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 0957-1736 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-2167
OpenAlex
W4413770347
Cited by
6
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Language Learning Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
foreign language anxiety, cognitive load, working memory, attention, need for cognition, foreign language learning, cognitive factors in language learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review