The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Suppression of soil-borne plant diseases with composts: A review
Abstract
Numerous container-based studies in greenhouses or growth rooms have consistently demonstrated a suppressive effect of composts on soil-borne diseases such as damping-off and root rots (Pythium ultimum, Rhizoctonia solani, Phytophthora spp.), and wilts (Fusarium oxysporum and Verticillium dahliae). Composts have also been shown to suppress several diseases in the field, although the effects have been generally smaller and more variable than in container experiments. Several diseases of turf grass were suppressed by top-dressing with compost. These diseases are Fusarium patch (Microdochium nivale), red thread (Laetisaria fuciformis), damping-off (Pythium graminicola), brown patch (Rhizoctonia solani), dollar spot (Sclerotinia homoeocarpa) and snow mould (Typhula ishikariensis). The disease suppressive effect of compost generally increased with rate of application. Compost inclusion rates of at least 20% (v/v) were normally required to consistently obtain a disease suppressive effect, particularly in peat-based media, but significant disease suppression has been found at lower inclusion rates in soil. Reported levels of disease suppression were variable, even using apparently similar composted materials at the same rates. Sterilisation of composted materials generally resulted in a loss in disease suppressiveness, indicating that the mechanism was often or predominantly biological, although chemical and physical factors have also been implicated. The mechanisms and antagonistic micro-organisms involved in disease suppression are not fully understood. Physiological profiling and the use of DNA-based techniques such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) may lead to an improved understanding of the changes in microbial communities associated with disease control resulting from compost amendment of soil, sand or peat. The inoculation of composts with biological control agents may improve the efficacy and reliability of disease control obtained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
B IOCONTROL W ITHIN THE C ONTEXT OF S OIL M ICROBIAL C OMMUNITIES: A Substrate-Dependent Phenomenon
Hoitink, H., & Boehm, M. (1999) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.427 · Cited by 843
Cited by
Biochar effects on soil biota – A review
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 · Cited by 5,074
Barrett, G. E., Alexander, P. D., Robinson, J. S., & Bragg, N. C. (2016) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.09.030 · Cited by 528
Identifying the characteristics of organic soil amendments that suppress soilborne plant diseases
Bonanomi, G., Antignani, V., Capodilupo, M., & Scala, F. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.012 · Cited by 504
Induction of Systemic Resistance in Plants by Biochar, a Soil-Applied Carbon Sequestering Agent
Elad, Y., David, D. R., Harel, Y. M., Borenshtein, M., Kalifa, H. B., Silber, A., & Graber, E. R. (2010) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-100-9-0913 · Cited by 398
Jaiswal, A. K., Elad, Y., Graber, E. R., & Frenkel, O. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.051 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Noble, R., & Coventry, E.
- Venue
- Biocontrol Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-20
- ISSN
- 0958-3157 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0478
- OpenAlex
- W2077424838
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suppression of soil-borne plant diseases with composts: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09583150400015904
- The paper
- Noble, R., & Coventry, E. (2005). Suppression of soil-borne plant diseases with composts: A review. Biocontrol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150400015904
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.