The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological control of the diamondback moth,Plutella xylostella: A review
Open accessAbstract
The diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), is one of the most destructive cosmopolitan insect pests of brassicaceous crops. It was the first crop insect reported to be resistant to DDT and now, in many crucifer producing regions, it has shown significant resistance to almost every synthetic insecticide applied in the field. In certain parts of the world, economical production of crucifers has become almost impossible due to insecticidal control failures. Consequently, increased efforts worldwide have been undertaken to develop integrated pest management (IPM) programs, principally based on manipulation of its natural enemies. Although over 130 parasitoid species are known to attack various life stages of DBM, most control worldwide is achieved by relatively few hymenopteran species belonging to the ichneumonid genera Diadegma and Diadromus, the braconid genera Microplitis and Cotesia, and the eulophid genus Oomyzus. DBM populations native to different regions have genetic and biological differences, and specific parasitoid strains may be associated with the specific DBM strains. Therefore, accurate identification based on genetic studies of both host and parasitoid is of crucial importance to attaining successful control of DBM through inoculative or inundative releases. Although parasitoids of DBM larvae and pupae are currently its principal regulators, bacteria-derived products (e.g., crystal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis) and myco-insecticides principally based on Zoophthora radicans and Beauveria bassiana are increasingly being applied or investigated for biological control. Viruses, nematodes and microsporidia also have potential as biopesticides for DBM. When an insect pest is exposed to more than one mortality factor, there is the possibility of interactions that can enhance, limit, or limit and enhance the various aspects of effectiveness of a particular control tactic. This paper reviews the effectiveness of various parasitoids and entomopathogens against DBM, interactions among them, and their possible integration into modern IPM programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Journal of Agricultural Research
(2023) · Journal of Agricultural Research, Pakistan · doi:10.58475/jar · Cited by 2,006
Biology, Ecology, and Management of the Diamondback Moth
Talekar, N. S., & Shelton, A. M. (1993) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.38.010193.001423 · Cited by 1,342
Evolution of Resistance to Bacillus Thuringiensis
Tabashnik, B. E. (1994) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.000403 · Cited by 1,150
Biochemistry and Genetics of Insect Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis
Ferré, J., & Van Rie, J. (2002) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145234 · Cited by 889
Tabashnik, B. E., Cushing, N. L., Finson, N., & Johnson, M. W. (1990) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/83.5.1671 · Cited by 781
Hymenoptera of the World: an identification guide to families
Goulet, H., & Huber, J. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 624
The Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa
(1939) · Annals of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/aesa/32.4.726 · Cited by 600
Bacillus thuringiensis : Biology, Ecology and Safety
Glare, T. R., & O’Callaghan, M. (2000) · Cited by 545
A critical evaluation of augmentative biological control
Collier, T., & Van Steenwyk, R. (2004) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.05.001 · Cited by 248
Norwegian journal of agricultural sciences
landbruket, S. F. F. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 202
Cited by
Siddiqui, J. A., Fan, R., Naz, H., Bamisile, B. S., Hafeez, M., Ghani, M. I., Wei, Y., Xu, Y., & Chen, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.1112278 · Cited by 281
Onstad, D. W., Liu, X., Chen, M., Roush, R., & Shelton, A. M. (2013) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1603/ec12287 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarfraz, M., Keddie, A. B., & Dosdall, L. M.
- Venue
- Biocontrol Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 763-789
- ISSN
- 0958-3157 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0478
- OpenAlex
- W1232544390
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological control of the diamondback moth,Plutella xylostella: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09583150500136956
- The paper
- Sarfraz, M., Keddie, A. B., & Dosdall, L. M. (2005). Biological control of the diamondback moth,Plutella xylostella: A review. Biocontrol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150500136956
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.