The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biology, Ecology, and Management of the Diamondback Moth
Abstract
In recent years, the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), has become the most destructive insect of cruciferous plants throughout the world, and the annual cost for managing it is estimated to be U.S. $I billion (168). Members of the plant family Cruciferae occur temperate and tropical climates and represent a diverse, widespread, and important plant group that includes cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, collards, rapeseed, mustard, and Chinese cabbage, the most important vegetable crop grown in China (90), the most populous country in the world. Although the diamondback moth is believed to have originated in the Mediterranean area (64), the source of some of our most important crucifers (185), diamondback moths now occur wherever cmcifers are grown, and this insect is believed to be the most universally distributed of all Lepidoptera (107). Absence of effective natural enemies, especially parasitoids, is believed to be a major cause of the diamondback moth’s pest status in most parts of the world (92). Lack of parasitoids in a particular area may have occurred because the diamondback moth is better able than its natural-enemy complex to become established in newly planted cmcifers. Reports on the ability of diamondback moths to migrate long distances are numerous (19, 40, 54, 58, 108, 120,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zalucki, M. P., Shabbir, A., Silva, R., Adamson, D., Shu-Sheng, L., & Furlong, M. J. (2012) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1603/ec12107 · Cited by 616
CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS OF TRAP CROPPING IN PEST MANAGEMENT
Shelton, A. M., & Badenes-Perez, F. R. (2006) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.150959 · Cited by 522
Self-citationBiological control of the diamondback moth,Plutella xylostella: A review
Sarfraz, M., Keddie, A. B., & Dosdall, L. M. (2005) · Biocontrol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/09583150500136956 · Cited by 268
Selenium-tolerant diamondback moth disarms hyperaccumulator plant defense
Freeman, J. L., Quinn, C. F., Marcus, M. A., Fakra, S., & Pilon-Smits, E. A. H. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.015 · Cited by 128
Perry, J. N., Devos, Y., Arpaia, S., Bartsch, D., Gathmann, A., Hails, R. S., Kiss, J., Lheureux, K., Manachini, B., Mestdagh, S., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2091 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Talekar, N. S., & Shelton, A. M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 275-301
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W2135291650
- Cited by
- 1,342
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biology, Ecology, and Management of the Diamondback Moth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.en.38.010193.001423
- The paper
- Talekar, N. S., & Shelton, A. M. (1993). Biology, Ecology, and Management of the Diamondback Moth. Annual Review of Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.38.010193.001423
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.