The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Why work–life balance now?
Open accessAbstract
In the vast literature on work–life balance (WLB) one question remains seriously under-elaborated: Why now? Where the question is mentioned, it is usually in passing so that we tend to find, often ...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions.
Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726713495704 · Cited by 341
An orchestrated negotiated exchange: Trading home-based telework for intensified work.
Bathini, D. R., & Kandathil, G. M. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3449-y · Cited by 106
The promise of a four-day week? A critical appraisal of a management-led initiative
Delaney, H., & Casey, C. (2022) · Employee Relations: The International Journal · doi:10.1108/er-02-2021-0056 · Cited by 41
Bloom, P., & Śliwa, M. (2022) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726721996763 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleetwood, S.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 387-400
- ISSN
- 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4399
- OpenAlex
- W2072491012
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why work–life balance now? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09585190601167441
- The paper
- Fleetwood, S. (2007). Why work–life balance now? The International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190601167441
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
