Cited by 42Employment, Labor, and Gender StudiesWork-Family Balance ChallengesLabor Movements and Unions

The promise of a four-day week? A critical appraisal of a management-led initiative

Delaney, Helen, Casey, Catherine·2022·Employee Relations: The International Journal

Abstract

Purpose: This article critically investigates a management-led experiment to institute a four-day work week with stated intentions of improving productivity and worker wellbeing. The article analyses the framing and implementation of the reduced work hours (RWH) trial, the responses of employees and the outcomes and implications of the trial. It raises concerns regarding the managerial appropriation of employee aspirations for more autonomy over time and improved work life. Design/methodology/approach: We conducted a qualitative case study of a medium-sized company operating in the financial services sector in New Zealand. Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 45 employees. Findings: Our study finds that the promise of a four-day week attracted employee favour and individualised benefits. However, entrenched managerialist practices of performance measurement, monitoring and productivity pressures were intensified. Pro-social and collective interests evident in labour-led campaigns were absent. We urge greater critical scrutiny into seemingly advantageous “business case” initiatives for reduced work hours. Originality/value: Little is known about what happens to concern for social and employee interests entailed in reduced working hours initiatives when a management-led initiative is implemented. Indeed, the majority of research focuses on the macro-level rather than interrogating the “black box” of firms. Our inquiry contributes to these debates by asking, how does a management-led RWH initiative affect employees?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/er-02-2021-0056

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delaney, H., & Casey, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
Venue
Employee Relations: The International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-08-10
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
176-190
ISSN
0142-5455 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3190201265
Cited by
41
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Employee Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Labor Movements and Unions
Keywords
four-day work week, working time reduction, employee well-being, productivity, employee autonomy, work-life balance, managerialism, performance measurement, employee reactions, financial services, New Zealand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review