Cited by 26Digital Communication and LanguageEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Interruptions in chat

Smith, Bryan, Sauro, Shannon·2009·Computer Assisted Language Learning

Abstract

The research on text-based synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC), while generally acknowledging the potential benefits afforded by the medium's capacity for extensive self-repair, has done little in the way of exploration of the nature of such text. Indeed, until quite recently, output logs have been favored almost exclusively at the expense of richer records of the interaction that can better account for this deleted text. Another basic aspect of SCMC interaction is the occurrence of interruptions initiated by one's interlocutor during the message composition phase. The possible effect of these interruptions on the chat interaction, however, has again been largely ignored in the literature. This study examines the relationship between these interruptions and deleted text as well as the effect such interruptions have on the subsequent output produced by learners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09588220902920219

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Text chat can help with noticing because there is a written record for learners to refer to, thus allowing them to scroll back through the conversation to check on linguistic forms (Beauvois 1992; Smith & Sauro 2009).

    “In addition, researchers argue that text chat can help with noticing because there is a written record for learners to refer to, thus allowing them to scroll back through the conversation to check on linguistic forms (Beauvois 1992;Smith & Sauro 2009).”

    From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Smith & Sauro 2009

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 41 · Cited by 26

Authors
Smith, B., & Sauro, S.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Bryan
Venue
Computer Assisted Language Learning
Published
2009-07
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
229-247
ISSN
  • 0958-8221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-3210
OpenAlex
W2164569586
Cited by
26
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Assisted Language Learning (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Arizona State University
  • American Council on The Teaching of Foreign Languages
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
interruptions, chat, self-healing, message composition, learner output, computer-mediated language learning, interaction logs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review