Cited by 39Gender, Health, and Social InequalitySexual Assault and Victimization StudiesLabour Market and Migration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“I made myself small like a cat and ran away”: workplace sexual harassment, precarious immigration status and legal violence

Villegas, Paloma E.·2019·Journal of Gender Studies

Abstract

This article examines the intersection between workplace sexual harassment, immigration status, and insecure employment status (‘precarious work’). Although a rich body of literature explores how gender impacts all three fields independently, less is known about how they interact. Drawing on narratives from migrant women with precarious immigration status in Toronto, Canada, I propose that experiences of sexual harassment illuminate the workings of migrant illegalization through ‘legal violence’. Furthermore, findings demonstrate that precarious status migrant women do not experience sexual harassment in isolation; other axes of oppression interlock to exacerbate it. Despite this, precarious status migrant women negotiate their experiences, sometimes enduring sexual harassment; referred to here as aguantar, and sometimes resisting it explicitly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09589236.2019.1604326

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Clark A., 2004, Hastings Women‘S Law Journal, 16, 139
  2. Fiedler S., 2010, Sex Roles, 62, 20
  3. Fudge J., 2012, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 34, 95
  4. Parra G., 2015, Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, 30, 99
  5. Romero M., 1992, Maid in the U.S.A
  6. Vellos D., 1997, American University Journal of Gender and the Law, 5, 407

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Villegas, P. E.
Affiliations
California State University, San Bernardino (US)
Corresponding author
Villegas, Paloma E.
Venue
Journal of Gender Studies
Published
2019-04-19
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
674-686
ISSN
  • 0958-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3869
OpenAlex
W2939519720
Cited by
33
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Gender Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Labour Market and Migration
Keywords
workplace sexual harassment, precarious employment, immigration status, migrant women, legal violence, illegalization, intersectionality, gender oppression, resistance, Toronto

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review