Cited by 4Labor Law and Work DynamicsEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesLabour Market and Migration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Migrant sexual precarity through the lens of workplace litigation

Open access
Boucher, Anna K.·2025·Gender, Work & Organization

Abstract

Theories of precarity have emphasized workplace isolation, worker vulnerability and a lack of control over key features of work. Migration status has been viewed as an attribute that can exacerbate worker precarity, and sexual violence and bodily injury are viewed by feminist scholars including Violence Against Women scholars as sources of such precarity as well. Nevertheless, how the interaction of workplace conditions, migration status, gender and sexual violence impact migrants needs more attention. A new evidence base, the Migrant Worker Rights Database, explores workplace violations against migrants in 907 tribunal and court cases brought by migrants in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States over a 20‐year period. The data collected for this project demonstrates that female migrants experience higher rates of sexual harassment, sexual assault, sexual servitude, and sex trafficking when compared with men. Further, while such collectively termed “sexual violence” offenses comprise a small percentage of cases in the Database (1.3%), they are characterized qualitatively by key features that present a heightened form of sexual precarity when compared with citizens: misuse by employers of visa conditions, debt bondage, live‐in arrangements, entrapment and slavery, and the combination of sexual violence with economic infringements such as wage theft and physical assault. Sexual precarity, this paper argues, should be viewed as an overlapping and reinforcing form of workplace precarity that has distinctly sexual and bodily dimensions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gwao.13160

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 10.1057/9780230299139 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/13505068211020791 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s10767‐013‐9152‐9 · DOI
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2016, Personal Safety Australia Canberra
  5. Beyond Survival Campaign, 2017, The Human Trafficking of Domestic Workers in the United States: findings from the beyond Survival Campaign
  6. 10.1111/j.1540‐5893.2009.00384.x · DOI
  7. Bronitt S., 2018, Rape Law in Context: contesting the Scales of Injustice
  8. Butler J., 2016, Frames of War: when Is Life Grievable?
  9. 10.1086/717695 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/hyp.2023.107 · DOI
  11. Cooper C., 2017, A Typology of Modern Slavery Offences in the UK
  12. 1985, Criminal Code
  13. 1995, Criminal Code
  14. 10.1177/0967010615601389 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/gwao.12803 · DOI
  16. Finemann M. A., 2008, The Vulnerable Subject: anchoring Equality in the Human Condition, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20, 1
  17. 10.1007/978-3-031-07929-0_1 · DOI
  18. 10.3138/9781442677944-007 · DOI
  19. Fudge J., 2016, Modern Slavery and Migrant Domestic Workers: the Politics of Legal Characterization
  20. Fudge J., 2006, Precarious Work, Women, and the New Economy: The Challenge to Legal Norms
  21. 10.1016/j.avb.2011.02.009 · DOI
  22. Gill A., 2013, Violence against Women: Current Theory and Practice in Domestic Abuse, Sexual Violence and Exploitation, 141
  23. Gómez‐González A., 2022, Without Support, Victims Do Not Report’: the Co‐creation of a Workplace Sexual Harassment Risk Assesment Survey Tool, Gender, Work and Orgnanization, 1
  24. 10.1080/10361146.2019.1663399 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/978-3-031-07929-0_8 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/1037969x1604100207 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Human Rights Watch, 2014, Hidden Away: Abuses against Migrant Domestic Workers in the UK
  28. International Labour Organization, 2005, Human Trafficking and Forced Labour Exploitation: Guidlines for Legislation and Law Enforcement
  29. International Labour Organization, 2022, Experiences of Violence and Harassment at Work: A Global First Survey
  30. 10.1177/0196859919874138 · DOI
  31. 10.1332/policypress/9781447306900.001.0001 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/0309132514548303 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1467‐6478.2015.00714.x · DOI
  34. 1958, Migration Act
  35. 10.1057/fr.1988.42 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 1990, NSW Crimes Act
  37. Onwuachi‐Willig A., 2018, What about #UsToo? the Invisibility of Race in the #MeToo Movement, Yale Law Journal Forum, 128, 105
  38. Ouwuachi‐Willing A., 2018, What about #UsToo? The Invisibility of Race in the #MeToo Movement, Yale Law Journal Forum, 105
  39. 10.1080/1369183x.2020.1732614 · DOI
  40. 10.1177/1077801203009006006 · DOI
  41. 2016, Prince Alfred College Incorporated v ADC
  42. 2009, R v Dobbie
  43. 2010, R v Netthip
  44. 10.1007/978-3-031-07929-0_2 · DOI
  45. 10.1371/journal.pone.0233683 · DOI
  46. Rodgers G., 1989, Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe
  47. Rubery J., 1989, Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe, 49
  48. Sabri B., 2014, Intimate Partner Sexual Violence: A Multidisciplinary Guide to Improving Services and Support for Survivors of Rape and Abuse, 246
  49. 10.18261/njc.24.2.4 · DOI
  50. Segrave M., 2017, Exploited and Illegal: the Impact of the Absence of Protections for Unlawful Migrant Workers in Australia, Melbourne The Border Crossing Observatory and the School of Social Sciences, Monash University
  51. 10.5204/ijcjsd.1995 · DOI
  52. Segrave M., 2023, Migrant and Refugee Women in Australia: A Study of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
  53. 1984, Sex Discrimination Act
  54. Shaw E., 2018, Sexual Harassment and Assault at Work: understanding the Costs, Institute for Women’s Policy Research Publication, IWPR B, 376
  55. 2010, Shuvalova v Cunningham
  56. 2008, Sieders, Johan v R; Somsri, Yotchomchin
  57. Standing G., 2011, The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class, 90
  58. Standing G., 2021, The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class Special Covid
  59. 10.1007/978-3-031-07929-0_4 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755929.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  61. True J., 2020, Violence Against Women: What Everyone Needs to Know
  62. 10.1177/000312240406900105 · DOI
  63. 10.1086/717700 · DOI
  64. 10.4324/9780203874424-9 · DOI
  65. 10.1177/1077801209360857 · DOI
  66. Willetts P., 2015, Unprecedented Damages Award in Sexual Harassment Case, CanLII Connects

Metadata

Authors
Boucher, A. K.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Boucher, Anna K.
Venue
Gender, Work & Organization
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-06-24
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
458-472
ISSN
  • 0968-6673 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0432
OpenAlex
W4400015137
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Gender Work and Organization (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • University of Sydney
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Labour Market and Migration
Keywords
migrant workers, workplace sexual violence, sexual harassment, sexual assault, sex trafficking, gender and migration, debt bondage, wage theft, personal injury, worker vulnerability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Migrant sexual precarity through the lens of workplace litigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gwao.13160
The paper
Boucher, A. K. (2025). Migrant sexual precarity through the lens of workplace litigation. Gender, Work & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13160