Locating the ‘invisible’ mum: exploring maternal selfie practices
Open accessAbstract
This article draws on ten semi-structured interviews with mothers about their maternal selfie practices in order to explore how they use and navigate the form in relation to their motherhood identities and experiences. Whilst work on the form is still emerging, we examine the claim that maternal selfies offer space for a uniquely subjective expression/depiction of motherhood. As part of this, we explore how discussions of their selfie practices – and appraisals of the cultural circulation of the maternal selfie – resist and (re)produce discourses on acceptable digital and cultural paradigms of motherhood. The themes which emerged from these data were 1) the maternal selfie as empowerment, 2) authenticity as regulatory discourse and 3) the risks of negative affect. In drawing on work on neoliberal and intensive mothering frames, the article examines how the increasing emphasis (in digital cultures in particular) on displaying the complex realities of motherhood are implicated within the surveillance and self-surveillance of maternal visibility in ways which may (further) delimit the possibilities for maternal self-expression.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Selfies can also be used as a means to negotiate social roles and societal expectations.
“they can also be used as a means to negotiate social roles and societal expectations (e.g., in the case of motherhood; see Gawro� nska & Sikorska, 2023;Holmes & Atkins, 2023).”
From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Holmes & Atkins, 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis
Byrne, D. (2022) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y · Cited by 3,604 · see citing works
Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications
(2010) · A Networked Self · doi:10.4324/9780203876527-8 · Cited by 1,724 · cited 18× · see citing works
“Within this context, the destabilization of the boundaries between public/private spheres engendered by SMPs allows for the functioning of a kind ‘of panopticon in which we are not only observed, disciplined, and repressed, but we also observe, evaluate, and repress . . . thereby normalizing the surveillance and self-…”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748691142 · DOI
- Archer, C., & Kao, K. (2018). Mother, baby and Facebook makes three: Does social media provide social support for new mothers? Media International Australia, 168(1), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X18783016 · DOI
- Astudillo-Mendoza, P., & Cifuentes-Zunino, F. (2022). Mothering on the web: A feminist analysis of posts and interactions on a Chilean Instagram account on motherhood. Feminism & Psychology, 32(3), 376-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 09593535221094251 · DOI
- Barnwell, A., Barbosa, B., & Ravn, S. (2021). Captured and captioned: Representing family life on Instagram. New Media & Society, 25(5), 921-942. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211012791 · DOI
- Beach, S. (2017). The embodiment and discourses of a taboo: #brelfie. Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitative Communication Research, 16(4), 43-59. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/127641799.pdf
- Berryman, R., & Kavka, M. (2018). Crying on YouTube: Vlogs, self-exposure and the productivity of negative affect. Convergence, 24(1), 85-89.
- Boon, S., & Pentney, B. (2015). Virtual lactivism: Breastfeeding selfies and the performance of motherhood. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1759-1774. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/3136/1398
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health, 11 (4), 589-597.
- Burns, A. (2015). Self(ie)-discipline: Social Regulation as enacted through the discussion of photographic practice. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1716-1733.
- Cambre, M., & Lavrence, C. (2019). How else would you take a photo? #SelfieAmbivalence. Cultural Sociology, 13(4), 503-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975519855502 · DOI
- Delaney, H., & Sullivan, K. R. (2021). The political is personal: Postfeminism and the construction of the ideal working mother. Gender, Work, & Organization, 28(4), 1697-1710. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12702 · DOI
- Ehrstein, Y. (2022). "Facilitating wife" and "feckless manchild": Working mothers' talk about divisions of care on Mumsnet. Feminism & Psychology, 32(3), 394-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221094260 · DOI
- Feasey, R. (2012). From happy Homemaker to desperate Housewife: Motherhood and popular television. Anthem Press.
- Feasey, R. 2020. "TV representations of mothers.'." In The international encyclopaedia of gender, media, and communica- tion, K. Ross Ed., pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119429128. · DOI
- iegmc171 · DOI
- Frosh, P. (2015). The gestural image: The selfie, photography theory, and kinesthetic sociability. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1607-1628.
- Gill, R. (2007). Critical respect: The difficulties and dilemmas of agency and "choice" for Feminism: A reply to duits and van Zoonen. European Journal of Women's Studies, 14(1), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506807072318 · DOI
- Gill, R., & Orgad, S. 2017. Confidence Culture and the Remaking of Feminism', New Formations. 91. https://doi.org/10. 3898/NEWF:91.01.2017 · DOI
- Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2018). The amazing bounce-backable woman: Resilience and the psychological turn in neoliberal- ism. Sociological Research Online, 23(2), 477-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418769673 · DOI
- Goc, N. (2014). Snapshot Photography, Women's Domestic Work, and the "Kodak Moment," 1910s-1960s. In E. Patton & M. Choi (Eds.), Home Sweat Home : Perspectives on Housework and Modern (pp. 27-48). Relationships: US.
- Greer, A. (2017). I'm not your mother!': Maternal ambivalence and the female investigator in contemporary crime television. New Review of Film & Television Studies, 15(3), 327-347.
- Güney-Frahm, I. (2020). Neoliberal motherhood during the pandemic: Some reflections. Gender, Work & Organisation, 27 (5), 847-856. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12485 · DOI
- Haverty Rugg, L. (1997). Picturing ourselves: Photography and autobiography. University of Chicago Press.
- Hays, S. (1996). The cultural Contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
- Johnson, C., & Rintoul, J. (2019). From nursing virgins to brelfies: The project of maternal femininity. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(8), 918-936. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1607267 · DOI
- Lazard, L. (2022). Digital mothering: Sharenting, family selfies and online discursive practices. Feminism & Psychology, 32 (4), 540-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221083840 · DOI
- Lazard, L., & Capdevila, R. (2020). She's so vain? A qualitative study of selfies and the curation of an online self. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1642-1659. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820919335 · DOI
- Lazard, L., Capdevila, R., Dann, C., Locke, A., & Roper, S. (2019). Sharenting: Pride, affect and the day-to-day politics of digital mothering. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12443 · DOI
- Leonard, J. (1999). Photography, Feminism and the good enough mother. In M. Hirsch (Ed.), The familial gaze (pp. 293-310). University Press of New England.
- Littler, J. (2013). The rise of the "yummy mummy": Popular conservatism and the neoliberal maternal in contemporary British culture. Communication Culture & Critique, 6(2), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12010 · DOI
- Littler, J. (2020). Mothers behaving badly: Chaotic hedonism and the crisis of neoliberal social reproduction' in Littler. Cultural Studies, 34(4), 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2019.1633371 · DOI
- Locatelli, E. (2017). Images of breastfeeding on Instagram: Self-representation, publicness, and privacy management. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707190 · DOI
- Lupton, D., Pedersen, S., & Thomas, G. (2016). Parenting and digital media: From the early web to contemporary digital Society. Sociology Compass, 10(8), 730-743. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12398 · DOI
- McRobbie, A. (2013). Feminism, the family and the New "mediated" Maternalism. New Formations, 80(80), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.3898/newF.80/81.07.2013 · DOI
- McRobbie, A. (2015). Notes on the perfect: Competitive femininities in neoliberal times. Australian Feminist Studies, 30 (83), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2015.1011485 · DOI
- Miller, A., Cartwright, C., & Gibson, K. (2018). Stepmothers' perceptions and experiences of the wicked Stepmother Stereotype. Journal of Family Issues, 39(7), 1984-2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X17739049 · DOI
- Moingan, E. L., Lawson, S., Duncan, A. R., Mahoney, J., & Briggs, P. (2017, May). Has Instagram fundamentally altered the 'family snapshot?. In CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025928 · DOI
- Nguyen, L., & Barbour, K. (2017). Selfies as expressively authentic identity performance. First Monday, 22(11). https://doi. org/10.5210/fm.v22i11.7745 OED (2013) 'Selfie'. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/selfie_n?tab=meaning_and_use#302967200 · DOI
- Orekh, E., & Bogomiagkova, E. (2017). Being on trend": Selfie as a social Phenomenon'. International Journal of Digital Society, 3(1), 1328-1243. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijds.2040.2570.2017.0152 · DOI
- Orton-Johnson, K. (2017). Mummy blogs and representations of motherhood: "bad mummies" and their readers. Social Media & Society, 3(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707186 · DOI
- Pederson, S. (2016). The good, the bad and the 'good enough' mother on the UK parenting forum mumsnet. Women's Studies International Forum, 59, 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2016.09.004 · DOI
- Rome, J. M. (2020). Exploring constructions of "good" motherhood on social media: Navigating neoliberal mommy rhetorics and the negative affective Entanglements of women's discourses on Pinterest, Facebook, and Instagram. In A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Graduate College of the University of Nebraska in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the degree of Doctor of philosophy. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI27836185/
- Rose, G. (2014). How digital technologies do family snaps: Only better. In J. Larsen & M. Sandbye (Eds.) Digital snaps: The new face of photography (pp. 67-86). I. B Tauris. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003103509-6 · DOI
- Saukko, P. (2008). The anorexic self: A personal, political analysis of a diagnostic discourse. State University of New York Press.
- Senft, T. M., & Baym, N. K. (2015). What does the selfie say? Investigating a global phenomenon: Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1588-1606.
- Tang, N. (2002). Interviewer and interviewee relationships between women. Sociology, 36(3), 703-721. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0038038502036003011 · DOI
- Tiidenberg, K., & Baym, N. K. (2017). Learn it, buy it, work it: Intensive pregnancy on Instagram. Social Media + Society, 3 (1), 1-13. January-March. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116685108 · DOI
- Tiidenberg, K., & Gómez Cruz, E. (2015). Selfies, image and the re-making of the body. Body & Society, 21(4), 77-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X15592465 · DOI
- Tomić, B. P. (2019). "How could a mother do that to her children?": Filicide and maternal ambivalence in Croatian media and online discourse. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 3(1-2). https://doi.org/10. 20897/femenc/5921 · DOI
- Tugwell, S. (2019). Breastfeeding selfies as relational practice: Becoming a maternal subject in the digital age: A single case study. International Breastfeeding Journal, 14(23), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-019-0218-9 · DOI
- Tugwell, S. (2022). Online breastfeeding publics: Sociality, support and selfies. Feminism & Psychology, 32(3), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221104877 · DOI
- Tyler, I. (2008). Chav mum, chav scum: Class disgust in contemporary Britain. Feminist Media Studies, 8(1), 17-34. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14680770701824779 · DOI
- Van Cleaf, K. M. (2020). The pleasure of connectivity: Media, motherhood, and the digital maternal gaze'. Communication Culture and Critique, 13(1), No.1. pp.36-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz045 · DOI
- Warfield, K. (2017). MirrorCameraRoom: The gendered multi-(in)stabilities of the selfie. Feminist Media Studies, 17(1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1261843 · DOI
- Wilson, J. A., Yochim, C., & , E. (2017). Mothering through precarity: Women's work and digital media. Duke University Press.
- Zappavigna, M., & Zhao, S. (2017). Selfies in "mommyblogging": An emerging visual genre. Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 239-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.05.005 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model
Hutmacher, F., Appel, M., & Schwan, S. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2384125 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Holmes, S., & Atkins, B.
- Affiliations
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Holmes, Su
- ORCID
- Holmes, Su
- Venue
- Journal of Gender Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-09-27
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 386-403
- ISSN
- 0958-9236 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3869
- OpenAlex
- W4387106429
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Gender Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Photography and Visual Culture
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Keywords
- motherhood, maternal identity, self-surveillance, authenticity, intensive mothering, empowerment, negative affect, self-expression, social media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review