The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modelling the energy demands of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment
Open accessAbstract
A modelling study has been developed in which the energy requirements of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors (MBRs) are assessed in order to compare these two wastewater treatment technologies. The model took into consideration the aeration required for biological oxidation in aerobic MBRs (AeMBRs), the energy recovery from methane production in anaerobic MBRs (AnMBRs) and the energy demands of operating submerged and sidestream membrane configurations. Aeration and membrane energy demands were estimated based on previously developed modelling studies populated with operational data from the literature. Given the difference in sludge production between aerobic and anaerobic systems, the model was benchmarked by assuming high sludge retention times or complete retention of solids in both AeMBRs and AnMBRs. Analysis of biogas production in AnMBRs revealed that the heat required to achieve mesophilic temperatures (35 degrees C) in the reactor was only possible with influent wastewater strengths above 4-5 g COD L(-1). The general trend of the submerged configuration, which is less energy intensive than the sidestream configuration in aerobic systems, was not observed in AnMBRs, mainly due to the wide variation in gas demand utilized in anaerobic systems. Compared to AeMBRs, for which the energy requirements were estimated to approach 2 kWh m(-3) (influent up to 1 g COD L(-1)), the energy demands associated with fouling control in AnMBRs were lower (0.80 kWh m(-3) for influent of 1.14 g COD L(-1)), although due to the low fluxes reported in the literature capital costs associated with membrane material would be three times higher than this.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Periyasamy, A. P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020495 · Cited by 652
Removal of colorants from wastewater: A review on sources and treatment strategies
Pavithra, K. G., P., S. K., V., J., & P., S. R. (2019) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2019.02.011 · Cited by 634
A Review on Recent Advances in the Treatment of Dye-Polluted Wastewater
Shabir, M., Yasin, M., Hussain, M., Shafiq, I., Akhter, P., Nizami, A.-S., Jeon, B.-H., & Park, Y.-K. (2022) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2022.05.013 · Cited by 399
Shin, C., & Bae, J. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.002 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, I., Pidou, M., Soares, A., Judd, S., & Jefferson, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 921-932
- ISSN
- 0959-3330 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-487X
- OpenAlex
- W2098508124
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling the energy demands of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09593330.2011.565806
- The paper
- Martin, I., Pidou, M., Soares, A., Judd, S., & Jefferson, B. (2011). Modelling the energy demands of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Environmental Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2011.565806
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.