The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Removal of Pharmaceuticals in Drinking Water Treatment: Effect of Chemical Coagulation
Abstract
The removal of selected pharmaceuticals (diclofenac, ibuprofen, bezafibrate, carbamazepine and sulfamethoxazole) by chemical coagulation was studied. Jar test experiments were done in MilliQ water, in lake water and in commercial humic acid solutions using aluminium (pH 6) and ferric sulphate (pH 4.5). The concentrations of the pharmaceuticals in the studied water samples were determined by HPLC analysis and UV detection. In MilliQ water coagulation, the pharmaceuticals were poorly removed (< 10%) with the exception of diclofenac, which was removed up to 66% with ferric sulphate. This compound was also the only pharmaceutical removed (30%) during the lake water coagulation with ferric sulphate. In the presence of dissolved humic matter, diclofenac as well as ibuprofen and bezafibrate could be removed by ferric sulphate coagulation. The removal of diclofenac reached a maximum of 77%, while 50% of ibuprofen and 36% of bezafibrate were removed. Hence, a high amount of high-molecular-weight dissolved organic matter enhanced the removal of ionisable pharmaceuticals. The non-ionisable compounds, carbamazepine and sulfamethoxazole, were not affected by the coagulation processes studied. Although conditions such as high humic material content, low coagulation pH and ferric coagulant increase the removal of certain ionic pharmaceuticals, it can be concluded that by coagulation it is not possible to entirely remove pharmaceuticals from water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Occurrence of Antibiotics in the Aquatic Environment
Hirsch, R., Ternes, T., Haberer, K., & Kratz, K.-L. (1999) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00337-4 · Cited by 2,140
Cited by
Luo, Y., Guo, W., Ngo, H. H., Nghiem, L. D., Hai, F. I., Zhang, J., Liang, S., & Wang, X. C. (2014) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.065 · Cited by 3,983
Patel, M., Kumar, R., Kishor, K., Mlsna, T., Pittman, C. U., & Mohan, D. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00299 · Cited by 2,654
A Review of Removal of Pollutants from Water/Wastewater Using Different Types of Nanomaterials
Amin, M. T., Alazba, A. A., & Manzoor, U. (2014) · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1155/2014/825910 · Cited by 645
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) for the removal of emerging contaminants from aquatic environments
Dhaka, S., Kumar, R., Deep, A., Kurade, M. B., Ji, S.-W., & Jeon, B.-H. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2018.10.003 · Cited by 615
Feng, L., van Hullebusch, E. D., Rodrigo, M. A., Esposito, G., & Oturan, M. A. (2013) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.061 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Vieno, N., Tuhkanen, T., & Kronberg, L.
- Venue
- Environmental Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-192
- ISSN
- 0959-3330 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-487X
- OpenAlex
- W2168981295
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removal of Pharmaceuticals in Drinking Water Treatment: Effect of Chemical Coagulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09593332708618632
- The paper
- Vieno, N., Tuhkanen, T., & Kronberg, L. (2006). Removal of Pharmaceuticals in Drinking Water Treatment: Effect of Chemical Coagulation. Environmental Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593332708618632
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.