CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 89Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHigher Education Research StudiesHealth and Lifestyle Studies

Relationships between college settings and student alcohol use before, during and after events: a multi‐level study

PASCHALL, MALLIE J., SALTZ, ROBERT F.·2007·Drug and Alcohol Review
DOI 10.1080/09595230701613601
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction and Aims. We examined how alcohol risk is distributed based on college students' drinking before, during and after they go to certain settings. Design and Methods. Students attending 14 California public universities (N = 10 152) completed a web‐based or mailed survey in the fall 2003 semester, which included questions about how many drinks they consumed before, during and after the last time they went to six settings/events: fraternity or sorority party, residence hall party, campus event (e.g. football game), off‐campus party, bar/restaurant and outdoor setting (referent). Multi‐level analyses were conducted in hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to examine relationships between type of setting and level of alcohol use before, during and after going to the setting, and possible age and gender differences in these relationships. Drinking episodes (N = 24 207) were level 1 units, students were level 2 units and colleges were level 3 units. Results. The highest drinking levels were observed during all settings/events except campus events, with the highest number of drinks being consumed at off‐campus parties, followed by residence hall and fraternity/sorority parties. The number of drinks consumed before a fraternity/sorority party was higher than other settings/events. Age group and gender differences in relationships between type of setting/event and ‘before,’ ‘during’ and ‘after’ drinking levels also were observed. For example, going to a bar/restaurant (relative to an outdoor setting) was positively associated with ‘during’ drinks among students of legal drinking age while no relationship was observed for underage students. Discussion and Conclusions. Findings of this study indicate differences in the extent to which college settings are associated with student drinking levels before, during and after related events, and may have implications for intervention strategies targeting different types of settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09595230701613601

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Paschall and Saltz (2007) confirmed students consumed more alcohol at fraternity/sorority parties than all other contexts, with the comparable exception of off-campus parties.

    “Paschall and Saltz (2007), using a random sample of undergraduate students (n = 10,152) attending 14 California public universities, confirmed students consumed more alcohol at fraternity/sorority parties than all other contexts, with the comparable exception of off-campus parties.”

    From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Paschall and Saltz (2007)

  • Paschall and Saltz (2007) found attendees of fraternity/sorority parties consumed the highest number of drinks consumed before the event.

    “The researchers also found attendees of fraternity/sorority parties consumed the highest number of drinks consumed before the event in comparison with attendees of house parties, campus events, off-campus parties, bars/restaurants, and outdoor events.”

    From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Paschall and Saltz (2007)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
PASCHALL, M. J., & SALTZ, R. F.
Corresponding author
PASCHALL, MALLIE J.
ORCID
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
635-644
ISSN
  • 0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3362
DOI
10.1080/09595230701613601
OpenAlex
W2084838471
Cited by
89
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 575 d)
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01-AA12516, R01AA012516)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
Keywords
college drinking, alcohol consumption, underage drinking, age and gender differences, alcohol risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Alcohol Drinking, California, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Students, Universities, Linear Models, Alcohol-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review