Hermeneutics and philology: a reconsideration of gadamer's critique of schleiermacher *
Abstract
*I would like to thank Andrew Bowie, Michael Forster, Espen Hammer and an anonymous BJHP referee for their comments on an early draft of this essay. Hans-Georg Gadamer's major work, Truth and Metho...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gadamer's critique of previous hermeneutic thinkers may not have been the most generous reading of earlier research.
“Some scholars have also noted that Gadamer's critique of previous hermeneutic thinkers may not have been the most generous reading of earlier research”
From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Gjesdal, 2006, pp. 133-134
Game hermeneutics can be built upon earlier theories of meaning that have been extensively theorized and validated.
“Game hermeneutics would be a good candidate for a theory of game meaning, since it can be built upon earlier theories of meaning that have been extensively theorized and validated (e.g., Bernstein, 1982; Gjesdal, 2006; Harrington, 2000; Lammi, 1991; Linge, 1973; Mendelson, 1979; Weberman, 2000).”
From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Gjesdal, 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games
Arjoranta, J. (2018) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/uep74 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gjesdal, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Gjesdal, Kristin
- Venue
- British Journal for the History of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-156
- ISSN
- 0960-8788 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3526
- OpenAlex
- W2005623731
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 25
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal for the History of Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Hans-Georg Gadamer, Friedrich Schleiermacher, hermeneutics, philology, Truth and Method, philosophy of language, philosophy of history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
