Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhancing integration and innovation in construction

Open access
Dulaimi, Mohammed Fadhil, Y.Ling, Florence Y., Ofori, George, Silva, Nayanthara De·2002·Building Research & Information

Abstract

The poor performance of Singapore's construction industry,like its counterparts in other countries, has been highlighted in many studies. The most recent study in Singapore, ‘Re-inventing Construction’, criticized the performance of the industry and identified fragmentation and segregation of design and construction activities as the main barriers to improved investment and development. The objective of the paper is to identify the activities and initiatives that will motivate and enable the Singapore construction industry to achieve both greater levels of integration and increase the volume of R&D and innovation activities. An industry survey, workshop and interviews identified six factors. The main theme underlying them is the need for the creation of improved business and market conditions that demand further integration and greater innovation effort to meet customer demands and expectations. De nombreuses études ont mis en lumière les performances médiocres de l'industrie de la construction à Singapour et dans d'autres pays. L'étude la plus récente sur Singapour, intitulée “Re-inventing Construction”, critiquait les performances de cette industrie et estimait que les principaux obstacles à l'amélioration des investissements et du développement étaient la fragmentation et la ségrégation des activités de conception et de construction. L'objectif de cet article est de recenser les activités et les initiatives qui motiveront l'industrie du bâtiment de Singapour et lui permettront de parvenir à une meilleure intégration et à une augmentation des activités de recherche et développement et d'innovation. Une analyse de cette industrie, un atelier et des interviews ont permis de dégager six facteurs. Le thème principal sous-jacent est la nécessité de créer de meilleures conditions pour les entreprises et le commerce, ce qui implique une meilleure intégration et un plus gros effort d'innovation pour répondre aux demandes et aux attentes de la clientèle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09613210110115207

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Dulaimi, M. F., Y.Ling, F. Y., Ofori, G., & Silva, N. D.
Venue
Building Research & Information
Published
2002-07
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
237-247
ISSN
  • 0961-3218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4321
OpenAlex
W2036520792
Cited by
215
References
1
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing integration and innovation in construction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09613210110115207
The paper
Dulaimi, M. F., Y.Ling, F. Y., Ofori, G., & Silva, N. D. (2002). Enhancing integration and innovation in construction. Building Research & Information. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210110115207

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.