The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Key influences on construction innovation
Open accessAbstract
The goal of this paper is to identify the main factors driving or hindering construction innovation. An analysis of the relevant literature indicates there are six primary influences: (1) clients and manufacturers; (2) the structure of production; (3) relationships between individuals and firms within the industry and between the industry and external parties; (4) procurement systems; (5) regulations/standards; and (6) the nature and quality of organizational resources. Attention to these factors by businesses and public policy makers would be a key component of effective innovation strategy and policy. Further research is needed, however, to explore the relationships between innovation influences, and between innovation influences and other aspects of business strategy and environment, in the context of broader societal considerations. Further research should also identify quantitative estimates of the impact of innovation on the construction industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. J. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00114-1 · Cited by 1,315
The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation
Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446190210163543 · Cited by 1,041
Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas
Bresnen, M., & Marshall, N. (2000) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/014461900370852 · Cited by 632
Models of Construction Innovation
Slaughter, E. S. (1998) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1998)124:3(226 · Cited by 549
Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction
Winch, G. (1998) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/096132198369751 · Cited by 339
Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects
Barlow, J. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00115-3 · Cited by 329
Leaders and champions for construction innovation
Nam, C. H., & Tatum, C. B. (1997) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/014461997372999 · Cited by 268
Innovation in the construction industry: the dominant role of the environment
Pries, F., & Janszen, F. H. A. (1995) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446199500000006 · Cited by 227
Building competitive advantage: innovation and corporate governance in European construction
Miozzo, M., & Dewick, P. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00173-1 · Cited by 221
Enhancing integration and innovation in construction
Dulaimi, M. F., Y.Ling, F. Y., Ofori, G., & Silva, N. D. (2002) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613210110115207 · Cited by 215
Cited by
The drivers for contractors’ green innovation: an industry perspective
Qi, G. Y., Shen, L. Y., Zeng, S. X., & Jorge, O. J. (2010) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.017 · Cited by 468
Green innovation adoption in automotive supply chain: the Malaysian case
Zailani, S., Govindan, K., Iranmanesh, M., Shaharudin, M. R., & Sia Chong, Y. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.039 · Cited by 397
The role of organizational culture in motivating innovative behaviour in construction firms
Hartmann, A. (2006) · Construction Innovation · doi:10.1108/14714170610710712 · Cited by 260
Matinaro, V., & Liu, Y. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.151 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Blayse, A. M., & Manley, K.
- Venue
- Construction Innovation
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 143-154
- ISSN
- 1471-4175 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005346184
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Key influences on construction innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/14714170410815060
- The paper
- Blayse, A. M., & Manley, K. (2004). Key influences on construction innovation. Construction Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170410815060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
