CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 110Disability Rights and RepresentationReading and Literacy DevelopmentInclusive Education and Diversity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dyslexia and inclusion: Time for a social model of disability perspective?

Open access
Riddick, Barbara·2001·International Studies in Sociology of Education
DOI 10.1080/09620210100200078
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Prevailing clinical and educational models of dyslexia have focused on effective ways of addressing the proposed core deficits such as poor phonological skills. These models have been helpful in guiding intervention and bringing about some improvements in children's literacy performance (Hatcher, 1994). From a social model of disability perspective these models have not considered sufficiently how cultural factors such as specified school literacy standards can transform the impairments that some children have into disabilities. The underlying tenet of inclusion is that the school should adapt its practice to accommodate the child (Clark et al, 1995; Jenkinson, 1997). This would suggest that an examination of the social model of disability perspective may have a role to play in future school policy and practice across Europe in respect to literacy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09620210100200078

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 41 references

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 1999, Dyslexia, Literacy and Psychological Assessment
  2. 1973, Special Educational Needs
  3. Fraser N., 1995, New Left Review, 212, 68
  4. 1996, What are Graduates? Clarifying the Attributes of Graduateness - A Paper to Stimulate Discussion
  5. Howe K. R., 1996, Disabilities and the Dilemmas of Education and Justice
  6. Kunc N., lecture presented to St Vrain School District
  7. Oliver M., 1998, Disabled People and Social Policy
  8. Peer L., 1996, Winning with Dyslexia
  9. Riddick, B. The Experience of Teachers and Trainee Teachers Who have Dyslexia. York, the 5th British Dyslexia Association International Conference Dyslexia at the Dawn of a New Century. Dyslexia at the Dawn of a New Century.
  10. Riddick B., 1997, Students and Dyslexia: growing up with a specific learning difficulty
  11. Salter R., 1995, Dyslexia: an international journal of research and practice, 1, 123
  12. Shakespeare T., 1998, The Body Line Controversy: a new direction for disability studies?
  13. Singleton C., 1999, Dyslexia in Higher Education: policy, provision and practice
  14. Singleton, C. Dyslexia in Higher Education: a review of progress in the UK. York, The 5th British Dyslexia Association International Conference Dyslexia at the Dawn of a New Century. Dyslexia at the Dawn of a New Century.
  15. Smith, C., Whiteley, H. and Windle, S. The Literacy Hour: accomodating children with literacy. York, 5th British Dyslexia Association International Conference Dyslexia at the Dawn of a New Century. Dyslexia at the Dawn of a New Century.
  16. Snowling M., 2000, Dyslexia
  17. Todd J., 2000, Dyslexia- Individual Education Plans
  18. Williams G., 1996, Exploring the Divide: illness and disability

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Riddick, B.
Affiliations
University of Sunderland (GB)
Corresponding author
Riddick, Barbara
Venue
International Studies in Sociology of Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2001-11
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
223-236
ISSN
  • 0962-0214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-5066
DOI
10.1080/09620210100200078
OpenAlex
W2039608335
Cited by
110
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Studies in Sociology of Education (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
Keywords
dyslexia, social model of disability, inclusive education, phonological skills, literacy intervention, school policy, disability classification, children's literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review