The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Six reasons why the waist-to-height ratio is a rapid and effective global indicator for health risks of obesity and how its use could simplify the international public health message on obesity
Abstract
We suggest that a simple, rapid screening tool-the waist-to-height ratio (WHTR)-could help to overcome debates about the use of different body mass index (BMI) boundary values for assessing health risks in different populations. There are six reasons for our proposal: WHTR is more sensitive than BMI as an early warning of health risks. WHTR is cheaper and easier to measure and calculate than BMI. A boundary value of WHTR = 0.5 indicates increased risk for men and women. A boundary value of WHTR = 0.5 indicates increased risk for people in different ethnic groups. WHTR boundary values can be converted into a consumer-friendly chart. WHTR may allow the same boundary values for children and adults. Communicating messages about health risk could be much simpler if the same anthropometric index and the same public health message can be used throughout childhood, into adult life, and throughout the world. This simple message is: Keep your waist circumference to less than half your height.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15268-3 · Cited by 12,717
Cited by
Ashwell, M., Gunn, P., & Gibson, S. (2012) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00952.x · Cited by 2,130
Self-citationBrowning, L. M., Hsieh, S. D., & Ashwell, M. (2010) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s0954422410000144 · Cited by 1,400
Self-citationLee, C. M. Y., Huxley, R. R., Wildman, R. P., & Woodward, M. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.08.012 · Cited by 1,173
Flegal, K. M., Shepherd, J. A., Looker, A. C., Graubard, B. I., Borrud, L. G., Ogden, C. L., Harris, T. B., Everhart, J. E., & Schenker, N. (2009) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.26847 · Cited by 819
Carmienke, S., Freitag, M. H., Pischon, T., Schlattmann, P., Fankhaenel, T., Goebel, H., & Gensichen, J. (2013) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/ejcn.2013.61 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashwell, M., & Hsieh, S. D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 303-307
- ISSN
- 0963-7486 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3478
- OpenAlex
- W1997182728
- Cited by
- 1,065
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
