Cited by 1,173Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBody Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis

Open access
Lee, Crystal Man Ying, Huxley, Rachel R., Wildman, Rachel P., Woodward, Mark·2008·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

Objective To determine which simple index of overweight and obesity is the best discriminator of cardiovascular risk factors. Study design and setting This is a meta-analysis of published literature. MEDLINE was searched. Studies that used receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and published area under the ROC curves (AUC) for overweight and obesity indices with hypertension, type-2 diabetes, and/or dyslipidemia were included. The AUC for each of the four indices, with each risk factor, was pooled using a random-effects model; male and female data were analyzed separately. Results Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Body mass index (BMI) was the poorest discriminator for cardiovascular risk factors. Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) was the best discriminator for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia in both sexes; its pooled AUC (95% confidence intervals) ranged from 0.67 (0.64, 0.69) to 0.73 (0.70, 0.75) and from 0.68 (0.63, 0.72) to 0.76 (0.70, 0.81) in males and females, respectively. Conclusion Statistical evidence supports the superiority of measures of centralized obesity, especially WHtR, over BMI, for detecting cardiovascular risk factors in both men and women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.08.012

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Zimmet P, Magliano D, Matsuzawa Y, Alberti G, Shaw J. The meta- bolic syndrome: a global public health problem and a new definition. J Atheroscler Thromb 2005;12:295e300.
  2. Woo J, Ho SC, Yu ALM, Sham A. Is waist circumference a useful measure in predicting health outcomes in the elderly? Int J Obes 2002;26:1349e55.
  3. Hsieh SD, Muto T. Metabolic syndrome in Japanese men and women with special reference to the anthropometric criteria for the assess- ment of obesity: proposal to use the waist-to-height ratio. Prev Med 2006;42:135e9.
  4. Dobbelsteyn CJ, Joffres MR, MacLean DR, Flowerdew G. The Cana- dian Heart Health Surveys Research Group. A comparative evalua- tion of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indicators of cardiovascular risk factors. The Canadian Heart Health Surveys. Int J Obes 2001;25:652e61.
  5. Shiwaku K, Anuurad E, Enkhmaa B, Nogi A, Kitajima K, Yamasaki M, et al. Predictive values of anthropometric measurements for multiple metabolic disorders in Asian populations. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2005;69:52e62.
  6. Lin WY, Lee LT, Chen CY, Lo H, Hsia HH, Liu IL, et al. Optimal cut-off values for obesity: using simple anthropometric indices to pre- dict cardiovascular risk factors in Taiwan. Int J Obes 2002;26: 1232e8.
  7. Ho SY, Lam TH, Janus ED. The Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Prevalence Study steering committee. Waist to stature ratio is more strongly associated with cardiovascular risk factors than other simple anthropometric indices. Ann Epidemiol 2003;13:683e91.
  8. Pua YH, Ong PH. Anthropometric indices as screening tools for car- diovascular risk factors in Singaporean women. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2005;14:74e9.
  9. Woodward M. Epidemiology: Study design and data analysis. 2nd edition. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2005.
  10. Ko GTC, Chan JCN, Cockram CS, Woo J. Prediction of hyperten- sion, diabetes, dyslipidaemia or albuminuria using simple anthropo- metric indexes in Hong Kong Chinese. Int J Obes 1999;23:1136e42.
  11. Sargeant LA, Bennett FI, Forrester TE, Cooper RS, Wilks RJ. Pre- dicting incident diabetes in Jamaica: the role of anthropometry. Obes Res 2002;10:792e8.
  12. Mirmiran P, Esmaillzadeh A, Azizi F. Detection of cardiovascular risk factors by anthropometric measures in Tehranian adults: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 2004;58:1110e8.
  13. Tran CQ. Assessment of the prevalence of obesity and related risk factors in Vietnamese adults living in urban areas of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. M.MedSc thesis. New Castle, UK: University of New Castle; 2004.
  14. Aekplakorn W, Kosulwat V, Suriyawongpaisal P. Obesity indices and cardiovascular risk factors in Thai adults. Int J Obes 2006;30: 1782e90.
  15. Sakurai M, Miura K, Takamura T, Ota T, Ishizaki M, Morikawa Y, et al. Gender differences in the association between anthropometric indices of obesity and blood pressure in Japanese. Hypertens Res 2006;29:75e80.
  16. Schneider HJ, Glaesmer H, Klotsche J, Bohler S, Lehnert H, Zeiher AM, et al. Accuracy of anthropometric indicators of obesity to predict cardiovascular risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92: 589e94.
  17. Sayeed MA, Mahtab H, Latif ZA, Khanam PA, Ahsan KA, Banu A, et al. Waist-to-height ratio is better obesity index than body mass in- dex and waist-to-hip ratio for predicting diabetes, hypertension and lipidemia. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2003;29:1e10.
  18. Hsieh SD, Muto T. The superiority of waist-to-height ratio as an anthropometric index to evaluate clustering of coronary risk fac- tors among non-obese men and women. Prev Med 2005;40: 216e20.
  19. Cikim AS, Ozbey N, Orhan Y. Relationship between cardiovascular risk indicators and types of obesity in overweight and obese women. J Int Med Res 2004;32:268e73.
  20. Yajnik CS, Yudkin JS. The Y-Y paradox. Lancet 2004;363:163.
  21. Lopez-Alvarenga JC, Montesinos-Cabrera RA, Velazquez-Alva C, Gonzalez-Barranco J. Short stature is related to high body fat compo- sition despite body mass index in a Mexican population. Arch Med Res 2003;34:137e40.
  22. Lara-Esqueda A, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Velazquez-Monroy O, Gomez-Perez FJ, Rosas-Peralta M, Mehta R, et al. The body mass in- dex is a less-sensitive tool for detecting cases with obesity-associated co-morbidities in short stature subjects. Int J Obes 2004;28:1443e50.
  23. Fuchs FD, Gus M, Moreira LB, Moraes RS, Wiehe M, Pereira GM, et al. Anthropometric indices and the incidences of hypertension: a comparative analysis. Obes Res 2005;13:1515e7.
  24. Zhu S, Heshka S, Wang ZM, Shen W, Allison DB, Ross R, et al. Combination of BMI and waist circumference for identifying cardio- vascular risk factors in Whites. Obes Res 2004;12:633e45.
  25. Stevens J, Couper D, Pankow J, Folsom AR, Duncan BB, Nieto FJ, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of anthropometrics for the prediction of diabetes in a biracial cohort. Obes Res 2001;9:696e705.
  26. Ashwell M, Hsieh SD. Six reasons why the waist-to-height ratio is a rapid and effective global indicator for health risks of obesity and how its use could simplify the international public health message on obesity. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2005;56:303e7.
  27. Huxley R, Barzi F, Stolk R, Caterson I, Gill T, Lam TH, et al. Obesity in Asia Collaboration. Ethnic comparisons of obesity in the Asiae Pacific region: protocol for a collaborative overview of cross-sectional studies Obes Rev 2005;6:193e8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, C. M. Y., Huxley, R. R., Wildman, R. P., & Woodward, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Crystal Man Ying
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
61
Issue
7
Pages
646-653
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018503115
Cited by
1,173
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 60
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
abdominal obesity, waist-to-height ratio, body mass index, cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity indices, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Body Height, Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Risk Factors, ROC Curve, Body Mass Index, Abdominal Fat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review