Cited by 40Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityMental Health and Patient InvolvementMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Taking anti-depressant medication: A qualitative examination of internet postings

Pestello, Frances G., Davis-Berman, Jennifer·2008·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

Background: The use of psychiatric medications has expanded dramatically in recent years. This opens opportunities for new lines of inquiry in the social and behavioral sciences.Aims: This paper examines the experience of taking anti-depressant medications and its impact on the sense of self.Method: This medication experience is captured through an analysis of postings on a health-related web site. Posting on the five most popular anti-depressant medication message boards were examined for common themes in 227 postings.Results: Four themes common to the five message boards are presented. Postings addressed general side effects, sexual side effects, giving medical advice and frustration with physicians. An analysis of these postings is discussed through the perspective of the damaged and healing selves.Conclusions: Taking anti-depressant medication created a contradiction among posters. They saw themselves as ill and rather ineffective patients. At the same time they saw themselves as actors who deserve good treatment, and in fact, have their own medical expertise. We use this conclusion to develop implications and limitations of this research with suggestions for future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638230701498333

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Breggin P., 1994, Talking back to Prozac: What doctors aren't telling you about today's most controversial drug
  2. Coile R, 2000, Physician Executive, 8
  3. Madara E, 1997, Social Policy, 27, 20
  4. Marano H, 2003, Psychology Today, 36, 58
  5. Slater L, 1998, Prozac diary

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pestello, F. G., & Davis-Berman, J.
Affiliations
University of Dayton (US)
Corresponding author
Pestello, Frances G.
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2008-01
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
349-360
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W2132929605
Cited by
40
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
antidepressants, medication experience, online message boards, adverse effects, sexual side effects, physician-patient relationship, selfhood, patient expertise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review