Cited by 130Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeAging, Health, and Disability

Health status and quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis

L. Ford, E. Gerry, M. H. Johnson, A, H.·2001·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to ascertain the health status and quality of life of a community based cohort of people with multiple sclerosis. Method A postal questionnaire with self-completed measures of impairment, disability, physical dependency and quality of life was sent to a random sample of 203 people with multiple sclerosis from a population register. The sample was stratified according to five disease courses. The population register is of the prevalent population of 760 people with multiple sclerosis resident in the Leeds Health Authority. The register used multiple sources of ascertainment and is prospectively maintained with new incident cases. Results The estimated mean age of people with multiple sclerosis is 46 years (SE: 0.85), and mean duration of disease is 14.4 years (SE: 0.69). Almost four in five (78 %) are female, and one in six (17%) live alone. Impairments of balance, vision and memory are common and in all cases there is little difference in the frequency between disease course groups. In contrast, impairments of bladder and bowel are more common in those with a progressive disease course. Disability is more common in those with a progressive disease course but all scores on the SF36 Physical Function scale are low and demonstrate the disabling consequences of the disease, irrespective of disease course. These consequences must contribute to the fact that over two-thirds (68 %) were not employed at the time of the survey. Quality of life does no…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638280010022090

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
L. Ford, E. G.
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2001-01
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
516-521
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2111703052
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, health status, quality of life, clinical course, disability, physical impairment, bowel and bladder dysfunction, balance disorders, visual impairment, memory impairment, physical function, employment, disease duration, SF-36
MeSH terms
Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review