Cited by 16Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and care

Self‐assessments and determinants of HRQ oL in a German MS population

Open access
Nickel, S., von dem Knesebeck, O., Kofahl, C.·2018·Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The importance of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is widely acknowledged. In 2015, a multicenter study was launched to assess the HRQoL and coping styles of chronically ill persons in Germany. The aims of this paper were (i) to describe how persons affected by MS assess their HRQoL and (ii) find out sociodemographic and disease-specific determinants of HRQoL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quantitative survey (optionally per paper-pencil or online) was conducted between March and October 2015 in Germany. Recruitment ways were as follows: Associations of the German Multiple Sclerosis Society (DMSG), medical practices specialized in neurology/MS, hospitals, public events, social networks, and self-help clearinghouses. To measure HRQoL, the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life (MusiQoL) questionnaire and the short form of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (FoP-Q) were used. RESULTS: A total of 1220 individuals with MS participated in the study. Frequent problems reported were related to activities of daily living as well as sentimental and sexual life. Multiple regression analyses identified disease severity and comorbidity-in different directions (positive and negative)-as the strongest factors in predicting activities of daily living, symptoms, sentimental and sexual life, and reject. The demographic variables sex, age, education, and employment status also have different impact on the HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Using HRQoL measures can be feasible outcomes in addition to clinical assessments of MS and other chronic diseases and can help better managing the care. Some challenges have to be taken into account involving patients and the limitations of our empirical study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ane.12854

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nickel, S., von dem Knesebeck, O., & Kofahl, C.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Institute of Medical Sociology University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Corresponding author
Nickel, S.
Venue
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-03
Volume
137
Issue
2
Pages
174-180
ISSN
  • 0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0404
OpenAlex
W2763855311
Cited by
16
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (ZMV15‐2514‐SBG‐008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, health-related quality of life, self-assessment, disease severity, comorbidities, activities of daily living, sexual life, emotional life, fear of progression, sociodemographic factors, chronic disease, MusiQoL, German patients
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review