The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing effective written health education materials: Considerations for health professionals
Abstract
PURPOSE: Written health education materials can only be effective if they can be read, understood, and remembered by patients. The purpose of this article was to review the literature about features that should be incorporated into written health education materials to maximize their effectiveness, identify where there is consensus and debate about which features should be incorporated, and develop recommendations that health professionals can use when reviewing their existing materials and designing new materials. METHOD: Literature review of published research and education articles. RESULTS: There is a large number of features that need to be considered when designing written health education materials so that they are suitable for the target audience and effective. Although there is consensus about the majority of features that should be included, further research is needed to explore the contribution of certain features, such as illustrations, to the effectiveness of written materials and the effect of well-designed written materials on patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals need to provide their patients with written health education materials that are patient-orientated and designed according to the best practice principles in written health education material design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Flesch, R. (1948) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057532 · Cited by 5,391
(2001) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/108107301752384442 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Aphasia friendly written health information: Content and design characteristics
Rose, T. A., Worrall, L. E., Hickson, L. M., & Hoffmann, T. C. (2011) · International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.3109/17549507.2011.560396 · Cited by 197
Self-citationChandler, C. I. R., Meta, J., Ponzo, C., Nasuwa, F., Kessy, J., Mbakilwa, H., Haaland, A., & Reyburn, H. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-83 · Cited by 32
Simmonds, M. K., Dick, B. D., Verrier, M. J., Reid, K. L., Jamieson-Lega, K., Balisky, K. J., Davey, A. E., & Freeman, K. M. (2022) · Children · doi:10.3390/children9091293 · Cited by 1
“The key features for an effective presentation were included as recommended by Hoffmann and Cutilli [30,31].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffmann, T., & Worrall, L.
- Venue
- Disability and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-10-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1166-1173
- ISSN
- 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5165
- OpenAlex
- W2019086535
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing effective written health education materials: Considerations for health professionals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09638280410001724816
- The paper
- Hoffmann, T., & Worrall, L. (2004). Designing effective written health education materials: Considerations for health professionals. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001724816
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.